You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The U.S. Military: Proud Owners of One-Third of Syria
2018-04-11
Moved to Page 4: Opinion because the writer is arguing for his point of view.
[NationalInterest] How many American citizens even realize the U.S. military now occupies most of the eastern third of Syria? There's been no new congressional authorization of force and scant debate on Capitol Hill. Contrary to effective strategy and sound policy, expansive war and military occupation is the default solution championed by the Washington establishment.

The problem with holding territory in Syria is quite simple: people live there. Real, live folks the U.S. military -- like it or not -- is now beholden to. These Syrians' hopes, dreams, sustenance, quality of life, gripes and complaints -- at the expense of domestic concerns -- become the responsibility of the U.S. government according to local perception. I've seen this movie before, experienced it, in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It doesn't end well.

Furthermore, Washington is being sucked ever further into the Syrian abyss for no strategic benefit to the United States.

Rhetoric aside, many of Trump's campaign statements were eminently reasonable. But contrary to his clear-eyed observations, his administration is doubling down and staying put in Eastern Syria.

A plea for clear-eyed policy to
cut our losses and sensibly redeployed our troops based on sober strategy and U.S. interests rather than reacting to a crisis merely because we can.
Thoughts?
Posted by:Alistaire Clunter7986

#6  Iskenderun? Wonderful weather.
We're slipping the Turk a French letter!
A century of cleansing
And diplomats fencing:
The Sandjak of West Kurdistan Alexandretta.
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2018-04-11 21:55  

#5  Why am I thinking 1914?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-04-11 13:08  

#4  How Russia Is Turning Syria into a Major Naval Base for Nuclear Warships
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-04-11 12:08  

#3  I believe that an independent Kurdistan would start another Arab war much like the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

I also believe it is a great idea and would put a stable wedge between Iran and Turkey as well as between Syria, Lebanon, and Iran.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2018-04-11 11:41  

#2  The tradeoff: Trade the Euphrates River region in return for the Hasakah province of easternmost Syria presently under control of the indigenous Kurds. How to set up a Kurdistan that would include parts of Iraq and Syria. A polity that could survive political and military attacks by Iraq and Syria and thus offer the US a safe base of operation to go along with Israel.
Posted by: Clurong Peacock9529   2018-04-11 10:23  

#1  How many American citizens even realize the U.S. military now occupies most of the eastern third of Syria?

Not bad for having only 2000 troops there. Any resources there?
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-04-11 09:21  

00:00