You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
A plea for solidarity with people who don't order stuff at Starbucks
2018-04-18
What the late Lionel Trilling used to call the liberal imagination was captured by the plight of two black men who went to a Philadelphia Starbucks and didn't order anything. 8,000 Starbucks stores closed yesterday for sensitivity training and the conscience of an anguished world pulsated with guilt and grief over the arrest of the two men, whose only offense was to stand there.

The two men were exactly right: The right thing to do in Starbucks is not to order anything, because the coffee is disgusting. Starbucks' response, to be sure, was incommensurate with the problem: Rather than subject their employees to the ritual farce of sensitivity training, the company should spend money on high-quality coffee beans, and roast them lightly rather than burn them into acidic volcanic ash. The best coffee (namely Italian espresso) is not bitter, but bittersweet, like dark chocolate. High-quality Italian coffee (for example Illy or Lavazza) is widely available in American supermarkets, and the persistence of Starbucks in the face of higher-quality competition is a testimony to the poverty of the American palate.

Famously, Starbuck's marketing idea is the "affordable luxury." So-called craft beers are another case. Although Americans can make excellent beer (Blue Moon is a perfectly good Hefeweizen, for example), most of the craft beers contain far too much hops and are too bitter for human consumption. The "hoppy" quality of craft beer has the same effect as the burning of Starbucks coffee beans: It adds a flavor which is mistaken for sophistication, when it is merely unpleasant. Not one of the great German beers has the hops content of the typical craft beer.

The real victims of Starbucks are not the two black men who were arrested for standing around without ordering anything, but the customers who actually ordered Starbucks coffee. Who will speak up for them? The best way to respond to this outrage is to stop into whatever Starbucks outlet you happen to pass, and when asked what you want, say in a loud voice, "I don't want anything! This coffee sucks!" See if they call the cops.
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#6  Duncan Donuts. Coffee flavored coffee. Not that fancy stuff that tastes either burned like someone put out a cigarette in it, or else poured a whole milkshake into it.
Posted by: Injun Bucket8891   2018-04-18 23:41  

#5  De gustibus non est disputandum.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2018-04-18 23:41  

#4  The good coffee that you roast yourself


Posted by: 3dc   2018-04-18 22:05  

#3  Nobody drinks Yuengling around here anymore?
Posted by: Glenmore   2018-04-18 18:15  

#2  Anyone that likes Blue Moon doesn't like beer
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2018-04-18 17:10  

#1   the persistence of Starbucks in the face of higher-quality competition is a testimony to the poverty of the American palate.

It's more about class signalling than palate. Sort of like an iPhone. IIRC several year back Consumer Reports rated McDonald's new coffee offerings better in taste.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2018-04-18 15:34  

00:00