You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The Short And Ugly History Of The Disastrous Iran Deal
2018-05-02
[The Federalist] On Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented documents to the world that prove Iran lied for years about its peaceful intentions. Netanyahu claims that in 2017 the Iranians moved "a comprehensive program to design, build and test nuclear weapons" to a secret location, and that a few weeks ago Mossad agents procured a half ton of that material and smuggled it out of the country. The United States has reportedly confirmed the authenticity of the documents.

The Iran deal, it’s worth remembering, is likely the only international accord the United States has entered into where it offered extensive concessions to a nation that continued to destabilize its interests, kill its soldiers, and threaten its allies. In return, we asked for nothing other than a promise that Iran uphold its preexisting obligations. The Islamic state, we shouldn’t forget, was already a signee to the non-proliferation agreements when the Obama administration saved its economy and reinvigorated its military.

It’s also worth remembering what we’ve given up for this deal. From the start there was almost nothing Obama wouldn’t do to save it. To pass it, the administration created (then bragged about) a media echo chamber that smeared the opposition at home. Obama accused those who opposed the accord of being in "common cause" with Islamists, offering the ludicrous false choice: his way or war. Some of the nastiest attacks were reserved for fellow Democrats like Chuck Schumer, whose tepid pushback triggered Obama flunkies to accuse of him of harboring dual loyalty.

Then there was the constant subjugation of American interests to placate the Iranians. First, Obama made "common cause" with Russia and Syria. It seems increasingly plausible, in fact, that the president was hamstrung in Syria because he wanted to avoid upsetting the Iranians and Russians. Vladimir Putin, the man who helped Iran create its nuclear program, was a fan of the deal. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was also an admirer, confident that Iran would continue its "just causes" after the deal was wrapped up. What could he possibly mean?
Posted by:Besoeker

#5  Dang, I think my wife is more comfortable on a bicycle than Baraq.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2018-05-02 12:22  

#4  "Why it’s impossible to hide nuclear work in 24 days – or 24 years"

Only if you play by the rules.
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-05-02 10:44  

#3  A very good, somewhat long summary of how we got to this point, with lots of links. I’m saving it for future reference.
Posted by: trailing wife   2018-05-02 09:43  

#2  The Iran deal "disaster" actually began 20 January 2009.

The Iran deal "disaster" actually began when USA started playing patsy with Iraqi Shia (despite being made aware that they're Iranian catspaws)
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-05-02 09:36  

#1  The Iran deal "disaster" actually began 20 January 2009.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-05-02 09:15  

00:00