You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Kimberley Strassel: Why the Justice Department Is Defiant
2018-05-09
[WSJ] A House subpoena, another missed deadline. What is the department hiding? - The feud that has simmered for months between Congress and the Justice Department erupted this week into a cage match. That’s because the House is homing in on the goods.

Until this week, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and fellow institutionalists at the department had fought Congress’s demands for information with the tools of banal bureaucracy‐resist, delay, ignore, negotiate. But Mr. Rosenstein took things to a new level on Tuesday, accusing House Republicans of "threats," extortion and wanting to "rummage" through department documents. A Wednesday New York Times story then dropped a new slur, claiming "Mr. Rosenstein and top FBI officials have come to suspect that some lawmakers were using their oversight authority to gain intelligence about [Special Counsel Bob Mueller’s ] investigation so that it could be shared with the White House."

Mr. Rosenstein isn’t worried about rummaging. That’s a diversion from the department’s opposite concern: that it is being asked to comply with very specific‐potentially very revealing‐demands. Two House sources confirm for me that the Justice Department was recently delivered first a classified House Intelligence Committee letter and then a subpoena (which arrived Monday) demanding documents related to a new line of inquiry about the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Trump investigation. The deadline for complying with the subpoena was Thursday afternoon, and the Justice Department flouted it. As the White House is undoubtedly monitoring any new congressional demands for information, it is likely that President Trump’s tweet Wednesday ripping the department for not turning over documents was in part a reference to this latest demand.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Huge bonuses and perks has corrupted federal beaurocracies. No way are deep state and politicians going to stop protecting the gravey train.
Posted by: Omeger Gray6606   2018-05-09 12:26  

#5  Strassel's piece is a good example of la la land. Saying Paul Ryan must do this or that knowing full well he won't when she knows full well he will not. Pretty much a joke. I've caught worms with more backbone than pooping Paul.

Kim completely omits that obvious criminal sedation present in the DOJ and the FBI 7th floor. That includes FBI Wray. So way go so soft?

She's ether a complete idiot or thinks we are.

Until someone sends literal pre dawn raids by the US Marshals nothing will happen. And she knows it.
Posted by:    2018-05-09 08:18  

#4  ...just a technical note. Posse Commitatus applies to the Army, not the Navy. The authors never imagined a Marine Corps the size of what it is today. Just saying, in sort of a historical perspective way, of dealing with coup plotters.
Posted by: P2kontheroad   2018-05-09 07:53  

#3  Raid their homes at 6AM; raid their offices and then raid their personal lawyers offices.
Posted by: Airandee   2018-05-09 06:19  

#2  Cornered rats?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-05-09 04:46  

#1  We can’t know the precise motivations behind the Justice Department’s and FBI’s refusal to make key information public.

Yes we can, simply subpoena their arses.
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-05-09 04:13  

00:00