| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government |
| US Navy's $13 Billion Supercarrier Just Got Even More Expensive |
| 2018-05-17 |
| Posted by:Skidmark |
| #4 Always beware when someone says they can an existing device work cheaper. It requires removing some function, somewhere. You have to start the job before you can "don't kill the job". |
| Posted by: gorb 2018-05-17 23:23 |
| #3 Many "first of their kind" tend to be over-priced disasters that quietly rust away into oblivion. Innovating doesn't necessarily mean it will be a good idea as seen with 20/20 hindsight. There have been some innovations that, well, faded away. The Swedes had the 'S-Tank' that pie shaped tank destroyer that they have quietly walked away from. The French had the AMX-30 that has quietly disappeared -- it had a novel anti-tank round that became irrelevant when the British developed Chobham Armor. And so it goes... |
| Posted by: magpie 2018-05-17 10:19 |
| #2 Always beware when someone says they can an existing device work cheaper. It requires removing some function, somewhere. |
| Posted by: ed in texas 2018-05-17 09:02 |
| #1 First of a kind. So lots of defects to be worked off and worked through. Why are people surprised by this? If this were the 4th one and still running into this stuff then there might be cause for alarm. Its not like we can just cancel it and stop making carriers. |
| Posted by: Glolush Whusotch4899 2018-05-17 03:25 |