You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Global Warming: Air Conditioners Are Bad For The Climate
2018-05-17
[TD] It’s a real vicious circle. The hotter it gets, the more air conditioners we use... and the more air conditioners we use, the hotter it gets. Because yes, air conditioners refresh us but they also contribute, paradoxically, to the climatic disturbance of the planet. These devices consume a lot of electricity. The latter is today mainly generated by gas or coal-fired power plants and these emit greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.

A report published Tuesday, May 15, 2018 by the International Energy Agency, ensures that unless a radical change of trajectory is implemented, carbon dioxide emissions related to air conditioning should almost double between 2016 and 2050. By comparison it’s like adding Africa’s CO2 emissions, about one billion tonnes of CO2 a year, to the CO2 emissions of the rest of the planet. And in cities, the warming effect of air conditioners is all the more felt. Indeed, each device rejects in the street the heat it has produced to cool the interior of a room.

The vicious circle is reinforced by the continuous rise in the standard of living in the world. Starting with China, India and Indonesia, three countries that will contribute half of the global rise in electricity consumption for air conditioning.
Posted by:Besoeker

#14  Make them burn dung
Posted by: Frank G   2018-05-17 21:16  

#13  So turn them off. Start with Facebook, Twitter, and Apple to set a good example. Expand to Congress and the letter agencies.
Posted by: KBK   2018-05-17 19:16  

#12  They something to do. Lets round them up and send them to fight the Kilauea volcano lava fĺows.
Posted by: Omeger Gray6606   2018-05-17 18:09  

#11  England used to be heavily forested. Granted that a lot of that heating was done for forges and the like but the still burned it clean until they started using coal.

Greenies are ignorant idiots for the most part.
Posted by: AlanC   2018-05-17 17:22  

#10  You're thinking of London's famous pea soup fogs, Rambler?

In a similar vein, Mr. Wife has described sitting at the back of his hotel lobby in Istanbul during the winter, back in the 1980s, seeing the pollution in the outside air dilute as it got farther from the front door. In those days, and probably still now, soft lignite coal was commonly used as heating fuel.
Posted by: trailing wife   2018-05-17 15:57  

#9  Also, as for "renewable" woodstove for heating: using wood for heating is only renewable if a FEW people do it. If everyone used wood, the German forests would be gone in a few years. Also, the problem with using wood for heat isn't really just the CO2,it's all the other things in the smoke. Again, if only a few people use wood, it's not a huge deal. As more and more people do, the smoke will become a huge problem - real pollution, not CO2.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2018-05-17 15:28  

#8  In my humble opinion, people who live in the southern US should have a small shrine in their homes dedicated to Willis Carrier, the inventor of modern air conditioning. Without him the South would not be as populated as it is today.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia    2018-05-17 15:23  

#7  Imagine how much money (for refugees) the French analog of social security saved, Pheresing Gloque4764.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-05-17 13:48  

#6  A few years ago there was a summer heat wave in France that left approx 14000 elderly Parisians dead (that an that fact that all the care-takers go for a month long holiday in August). Air-conditioners were very heavily restricted in Paris at the time.
Posted by: Pheresing Gloque4764   2018-05-17 11:34  

#5  Think about it for a second and the Baseline need for electricity, lots of electricity, in a typical American home will be in (1) keeping the food cold (freezer and/or kitchen fridge) and the (2) climate control of the living spaces.
There is an entire industry in shelf stable milk processing, UHT pasteurization, because they want to avoid the infrastructure necessary to keep milk cool. The question is at what level the central authority can decide whether you can be cool, or not, right?
Posted by: magpie   2018-05-17 10:05  

#4  On a recent vacation in southern Germany, the tour guide was bragging the Germans had shut down the nukes and the people were heating their homes with 'sustainable' firewood.

Like the House Hunters International show about a climate-change grad student delighted that one of her choices for a dwelling in Europe included a wood-burning stove. Whaddaya think the smoke smell comes from, sweetheart?

Good thing they have non-CO2-producing firewood in Germany! (sarc) Especially compared to non-CO2-producing nuclear plants.
Posted by: Bobby   2018-05-17 08:49  

#3  Farmers should pay CO2 emitters for their airborne plant food.

CO2 makes no difference to temperature. Air pressure does.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2018-05-17 04:30  

#2  If only your mamas required their clients, never mind.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-05-17 03:55  

#1  Not having them now whould make me want to destroy the whole world. You stupid idiot limo riding worthless assholes.

Part of being back here is air conditioning, can't you get that you barbarian?

This is why we cannot have nice things.
Posted by: newc   2018-05-17 02:26  

00:00