You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
--Tech
Obama Records Missing At National Archives [VIDEO]
2018-06-12
[Victory Girls] It seems that Hillary Clinton’s issues with transparency were rather widespread during the Obama Administration years ‐ and it’s going to affect history, research, and scholarship on that period forever, because the National Archives are missing records that they should have had.

Detailed on Real Clear Politics, it seems that electronic record keeping is just as easy to get rid of as paper copies for the federal government, if you’re determined enough. The digital upgrade to the National Archives was signed into law by President Obama in 2014.
For the first time electronic government records were placed under the 1950 Federal Records Act. The new law also included updates clarifying "the responsibilities of federal government officials when using non-government email systems" and empowering "the National Archives to safeguard original and classified records from unauthorized removal." Additionally, it gives the Archivist of the United States the final authority in determining just what is a government record.

And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and "loss" of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record "losses" as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it "an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws."

Clearly, America’s National Archives is facing the first major challenge to its historic role in preserving the records of the United States. What good is the National Archives administering a presidential library, like the planned Obama library in Chicago, if it is missing critical records of interest to scholars? And what’s to prevent evasion of the entire federal records system by subsequent administrations to suit current politics rather than serve scholars for centuries to come?

That planned Obama library in Chicago is actually meant to be more of a shrine, and not one everyone is on board with, incidentally. But back to the issue at hand. Are we really shocked that the Obama Administration would conveniently lose non-backed up electronic records ‐ this supposedly tech-savvy crew?
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  Found one:


Posted by: Anomalous Sources   2018-06-12 21:29  

#7  "That planned Obama library in Chicago"

Could its use be upgraded to a prison for dodgy dems?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2018-06-12 12:46  

#6  Maybe Obama has no legacy.

That would be President Trump.
Posted by: SteveS   2018-06-12 12:11  

#5  Maybe Obama has no legacy.

He does, just not the one he was hoping for.
Posted by: gorb   2018-06-12 09:54  

#4  Sandy Berger, Digital Archivist, had no comment
Posted by: Frank G   2018-06-12 08:58  

#3  How could this happen? Michelle set them right next to his college transcripts.
Posted by: airandee   2018-06-12 08:57  

#2  Maybe Obama has no legacy.
Posted by: JohnQC   2018-06-12 08:16  

#1   What good is the National Archives...missing critical records of interest to scholars prosecutors?

FIFY
Posted by: AlanC   2018-06-12 08:02  

00:00