Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Strzok Failed His Polygraph Yet Retained Security Clearance and Position on Two Investigations |
2018-07-08 |
[THECONSERVATIVETREEHOUSE] FBI Agent Peter Strzok failed his polygraph and his supervisors were notified on January 16th, 2016, his results were “out of scope“. Meaning he failed his polygraph test. Yet he was never removed from any responsibilities; and against dept policy, he did not have his clearance revoked until he could clear. |
Posted by:Fred |
#8 ...not to be confused with a Mueller which expands the areas of interest. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-07-08 19:08 |
#7 Polygraph is too much a "voodoo science"... For the GP, a poly can readily narrow the range of subject matter of interest for further investigation. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2018-07-08 13:11 |
#6 So the point of a polygraph test is to provide employment for the testers? There are no consequences? |
Posted by: Bobby 2018-07-08 11:56 |
#5 Interesting, but not definitive. Polygraph is too much a "voodoo science"... |
Posted by: magpie 2018-07-08 10:28 |
#4 ...politics is local? There are 535 wolves busy dividing up the |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-07-08 07:01 |
#3 There are 535 members in the Congress, 100 senators and 435 representatives. From that number only 3 or 4 (Nunes, Gowdy, Jordan), appear to be somewhat actively engaged in the current FBI-Russian scandal. What am I missing ? |
Posted by: Besoeker 2018-07-08 04:17 |
#2 Having worked with elementary teachers across the USA in the 70's and early 80's, it became hard enough for me to digest that we had such bad teachers, that I left the business. We couldn't get rid of them. And yes, Strzok is to testify on Tuesday, but as Trey Growdy said, "I had 11 hours with him in closed session. And asked every question I wanted. But in open session, I have five minutes." We only get to witness the five minutes. |
Posted by: Sherry 2018-07-08 03:58 |
#1 As Mickey Kaus said nearly two decades ago - 'do you know how difficult it is to fire a Federal employee?' Here's your proof. |
Posted by: Raj 2018-07-08 00:31 |