Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Culture Wars |
The Phobia(s) That May Destroy America |
2018-09-03 |
![]() It seems that there are quite a few people who vote Democratic, even when their domestic and foreign-policy views are not closely aligned with those of the Democratic Party, because they view the Republican Party and its candidates as being dominated by Christians and “rednecks.” This phenomenon has become even more noticeable of late, with the vitriolic attitude of certain prominent “conservatives” toward Trump supporters as a class. What is the origin of this anti-Christian anti-“redneck” feeling? Some have suggested that it’s a matter of oikophobia … the aversion to the familiar, or “the repudiation of inheritance and home,” as philosopher Roger Scruton uses the term. I think this is doubtless true in some cases: the kid who grew up in a rural Christian home and wants to make a clean break with his family heritage, or the individual who grew up in an oppressively conformist Bible Belt community. But I think such cases represent a relatively small part of the category of people I’m talking about here. A fervently anti-Christian, anti-Southern individual who grew up in New York or Boston or San Francisco is unlikely to be motivated by oikophobia. Indeed, far from being excessively familiar, Christians and Southern people are likely as exotic to him as the most remote tribes of New Guinea. |
Posted by:newc |
#7 Not Deliverance, Jerry Springer, Jerry's Kids. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-09-03 16:00 |
#6 Well it's easy and fun to drop into a Redneck/Hillbilly/PoorWhiteTrash accent and make a comment. Plus all the stupid videos on YouTube don't help. I have met the stereotical R/H/PWT from the South (and some from Northern Wisconsin too) plus the well read, polite, urbane Southerners. The South is too large an area to apply one stereotype to. Just as most places in the country are. After all everybody from NYC doesn't talk in a Brooklyn accent. As to the anti Cristian sentiment or prejudice. They see it as safe IMO. What it basically boils down to is "what we have here, is a failure to communicate" |
Posted by: Cheaderhead 2018-09-03 14:41 |
#5 I'm wondering why the writer is "Continually dismayed". Is that some kind of rhetorical device, or is he just too dumb to see what's in front of him? |
Posted by: charger 2018-09-03 14:18 |
#4 I wonder: how many "educated/urban/upper-middle-class" people think that Deliverance is a documentary? Wait, WHAT? |
Posted by: Skidmark 2018-09-03 13:55 |
#3 Safer socially than bigotry against Black people or gays, Muslims or those New Guinea tribesmen--no violent pushback Peter Strzok wrote to his lover Lisa Page (page 400 of DOJ IG report August 26, 2016, Strzok: “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support....” The left believes all the Hollywood stereotypes? So it's O.K. for the left to use Southern Christians as pinatas because it's safer and there's no risk of violent pushback? That is sick. Pushback has been coming, at least politically (election of Trump, control of both houses, firings, reassignments, resignations, referrals, neuterings) and the left has gone more bat shit crazy. The left had best not carry this too far. There are many, many Christians; they strongly support the 2nd Amendment. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2018-09-03 11:53 |
#2 I wonder: how many "educated/urban/upper-middle-class" people think that Deliverance is a documentary? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-09-03 07:56 |
#1 Fear of irrelevancy, check. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2018-09-03 04:15 |