You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Canada: Islamic Veil Allowed in Legal Hearing
2018-10-06
That’s carefully nonspecific: do they mean a hijab showing the face, hijab plus niqab showing only the eyes, or the lovely blue Afghan burqa, where even the eyes are coveed with a woven screen?
[AnNahar] A judge cannot refuse to take testimony from a woman because she is wearing an Islamic veil, a court has ruled.

A citizen may wear any religious attire in a courtroom so long as their "religious beliefs are sincere" and they do not "conflict with another person's constitutional rights," the Quebec Court of Appeal ruled unanimously.

Montrealer Rania El-Alloul, a Moslem, was expelled from a courtroom in 2015 for wearing a hijab.

Judge Eliana Marengo of the Court of Quebec had cited a court ruling that every person must be "appropriately dressed" and compared El-Alloul's headscarf "to a hat or sunglasses."

But Marengo did not take into account the right of El-Alloul "to religious expression," the three appeals judges ruled.
Posted by:trailing wife

#5  Canada apparently does not have a right to face one's accusers.
Posted by: Injun Bucket8891   2018-10-06 12:52  

#4  "conflict with another person's constitutional rights"

What happened to "facing one's accuser"?
Posted by: Skidmark   2018-10-06 12:40  

#3  So can British Morse dancers wear their bells?
Posted by: Woodrow   2018-10-06 12:32  

#2  How will the judge know the correct person is testifying?
Posted by: Jolumble Dark Lord of the Poles6494   2018-10-06 11:26  

#1  OutEUroping EUrope?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2018-10-06 04:22  

00:00