You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Federal Court Says Clinton Must Answer More Ques About Her Emails
2018-11-16
[Daily Caller] A federal court is compelling former secretary of state Hillary Clinton to respond to further questions ‐ under oath ‐ about her notorious emails.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued the ruling Wednesday in response to a lawsuit from Judicial Watch, the conservative research and investigative group that has long had its sights on both of the Clintons.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton was jubilant about the decision in a Thursday morning tweet: "Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions ‐ including key [questions] about the setting up of her email system."

The decision is the result of a Freedom of Information lawsuit initiated by Judicial Watch that sought to clarify why Clinton’s executive assistant, Huma Abedin, was authorized to be both an employee of the State Department and a "special government employee" for outside jobs, according to news release issued Thursday by Judicial Watch.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Judge better be careful walking through dark parks at night when sudden suicidal actions can be had.
Posted by: DarthVader   2018-11-16 09:22  

#5  Add murder or accessory to murder, to the list. There’s no statute of limitations and no shortage of questionable deaths to investigate.
Posted by: Speamble Elmeack5265   2018-11-16 07:05  

#4  I had a thought about this that just charmed the hell of of me. Given the Dem's screaming and running in terror when Ms Clinton intimated she'd like to run again, they and The Dead Hand of Government(TM) may just remove the buffers that have prevented her from being held to task about (a) emails, (b) selling US uranium to Russia (c) RICO activities of the Clinton Foundation (d) all of the above. Probably wishful thinking, I know, but a man can dream......
Posted by: Mercutio   2018-11-16 06:35  

#3  The answers will be the same: I have no recollection.

"That was a long time ago, and beisides, at this point what difference does it make?"
Posted by: Besoeker   2018-11-16 04:51  

#2  The answers will be the same: I have no recollection.

And she wants to be president.
Posted by: gorb   2018-11-16 02:25  

#1  Buying more popcorn.....
Posted by: crazyhorse   2018-11-16 00:30  

00:00