| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Judge dismisses lawsuit against Arkansas' anti-BDS law |
| 2019-01-25 |
| [ArutzSheva] A federal US judge has let stand an Arkansas law requiring state contractors to pledge not to boycott Israel, ruling that such a boycott is not protected by the First Amendment, The Associated Press reports. The ruling was handed down on Wednesday by US District Judge Brian Miller, who dismissed the lawsuit the Arkansas Times had filed challenging the 2017 law. The newspaper had asked the judge to block the law, which requires contractors with the state to reduce their fees by 20 percent if they don’t sign the pledge. The Times’ lawsuit said the University of Arkansas Pulaski Technical College refused to contract for advertising with the newspaper unless the newspaper signed the pledge. The paper isn’t engaged in a boycott against Israel, according to AP. Miller wrote on his ruling that refusing to purchase items isn’t protected speech. He noted that the Times wouldn’t be barred from other protected forms of speech, including writing or picketing against Israel policies. And the reason I put this in WoT Operations and not politics is because |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #5 Maybe the FBI should be looking into jihadi links in the Arkansas Times staff? |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2019-01-25 17:19 |
| #4 How did the Arkansas Times even have standing to sue? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2019-01-25 15:04 |
| #3 BDS is a form of warfare Absolutely true. But as this form of the soft jihad of the law does not directly involve bombs, bullets, blood, and death, it goes on Page 2: War on Terror Background/Politics. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2019-01-25 13:01 |
| #2 Because BDS is a form of warfare |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2019-01-25 12:49 |
| #1 ...cause the Venn Diagram of those giving aid and comfort to terrorists and the BDS crowd seems sort of tight? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-01-25 11:54 |