You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Rethinking hero status: Was Martin Luther King Jr. a monster?
2019-06-17
[American Thinker] César Chávez once declared, "History will judge societies and governments -- and their institutions -- not by how big they are or how well they serve the rich and the powerful, but by how effectively they respond to the needs of the poor and the helpless."

This quote got me thinking. How will history judge Martin Luther King Jr.?

The Troubling Legacy of Martin Luther King, a recent essay published by widely respected historian David Garrow in Standpoint, a widely respected British magazine, sparked fierce debate among historians. Within the press, however, Garrow’s essay was met with a reaction somewhere between ambivalence and outright refutation.

Remember, this is David Garrow, author of King’s Pulitzer Prize-winning biography. This is an author of real merit.

According to Garrow, King engaged in orgies, solicited prostitutes, and "looked on and laughed" as a rape took place before his very eyes.

Again, this report comes from a senior advisor to Eyes on the Prize, an award-winning series documenting the Civil Rights movement. Garrow is very much a liberal's liberal. He’s certainly no friend of the right, and he’s certainly no enemy of King's. In fact, Garrow is, in many ways, a former idolator.

The allegations against Dr. King are as shocking as they are unfathomable. How could this man, an activist and orator like no other, act in such a monstrous manner? In King’s famous "I have a dream" speech, the self-professed pacifist eloquently expressed the hope that someday his children would be able to live in a nation "where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Well, Dr. King, your wish has been granted, because here we are, all these years later, judging the content of your character.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Isn't everyone, in their time?
Posted by: Skidmark   2019-06-17 20:52  

#5  Mike: No, I remember it too. I think though it was just rumors then. Nobody with pull had come forward claiming to have heard the tapes by the FBI. That's the difference now. This also might have been planned as "soft" release since the tapes are supposed to be declassified in... what, 2024?
Posted by: Charles   2019-06-17 19:15  

#4  Agreed, charger. He did advocate having the father in the household and doing your best at what you do, so there's that.

Don't know if he would have gone 'Full Grifter' like one of the other two you mention (not John L.).
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2019-06-17 16:43  

#3  I never hero-worshipped him.

He was at best a flawed human who did some good things while having socialistic views, and who was drifting even further left before his assassination.

He would have been like Jesse Jackson or John L. Lewis (but more sonorously articulate) had he lived.
Posted by: charger   2019-06-17 14:48  

#2  ...Am I the only one who remembers hearing about this twenty-something years ago?

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2019-06-17 12:03  

#1  What's unfathomable to me is how an entire nation can allow itself to be brought to it's knees at the altar of guilt, citing inaccurate historical depictions and blatant panhandling for 'respect' by openly un-American communities.
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-06-17 09:15  

00:00