You have commented 338 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Maritime Security: Tanker Attacks Spark Call-Ups For Guards
2019-06-21
[Feral Jundi] I haven’t posted a MarSec deal in awhile, and I thought this was relevant. Basically tankers have been getting attacked in the Gulf of Oman, and this is really freaking out the shipping industry. The various MarSec companies are getting bombarded with calls for security, and it is reminiscent of the days when the Somali Pirates was the big problem.

The difference here is Iran, and/or it’s proxies are the attackers. So this is a case of private security defending vessels against state sponsored actions. Crazy.... Kind of like defending merchant ships against Germany’s U-boats during WW 1 and 2.

The article also delves into what has happened to the MarSec industry over the years. Salaries have decreased, and cheaper guards have been used to fill the need for armed guards on boats. The problem with this is that they may be cheap, but you get what you pay for. Some Indian or Eastern European guard is definitely not the equivalent to a highly trained Royal Marine or Navy SEAL... Just saying. But that is where the industry has gone over the years. There have also been incidents where guards have been imprisoned by states, which is an interesting thought for this deal with Iran.

Iran might view the ships as targets to not only blow up, but to also take hostages. You never know with this stuff and everything has to be considered with this type of enemy. Just look at the historic examples of what Iran has done. 52 American hostages were held for 444 days back in the late seventies as a means of attacking the west. So a guard force is definitely important for these vessels.

In the case of these recent attacks, limpet mines were attached to the vessels. Any guard force assigned to a vessel will have to have the means to look for these things. I would say SEALs or similar former military types, with a diving background and naval special warfare experience would be the optimum resource for this type of threat.

Other types of attacks might include missiles or armed UAVs, like what the Houthis have been using in Yemen. Do shipping companies have a counter-UAV capability? Or a counter-missile battery? Good question, but if munitions like this are launched at ships, shipping companies will have to re-calibrate.
Posted by:Besoeker

#3  Iran will just claim that the tanker "violated their territorial waters", and capture them. That's what they did when a US Navy boat wandered to close to their territorial limit.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2019-06-21 14:43  

#2  ...Just make it clear that if they're going after civilian shipping going about its lawful business, then they AIN'T Revolutionary Guard, they AIN'T 'state actors' - they're pirates and will be treated as such.

Bullies tend to get very careful very quick when it's clear that they only stand a 50/50 chance of coming home alive.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2019-06-21 13:44  

#1  Might turn out to be a good thing. More jobs for retired personnel and contractors if specialized security is needed. Bad news for those somali monkeys.
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-06-21 12:55  

00:00