You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
U.S. Senate defeats measure to restrain Trump on Iran
2019-06-29
[Jpost] The U.S. Senate on Friday defeated legislation that would have barred President Donald Trump
...Oh, noze! Not him!...
from launching an attack on Iran
...a theocratic Shiite state divided among the Medes, the Persians, and the (Arab) Elamites. Formerly a fairly civilized nation ruled by a Shah, it became a victim of Islamic revolution in 1979. The nation is today noted for spontaneously taking over other countries' embassies, maintaining whorehouses run by clergymen, involvement in international drug trafficking, and financing sock puppet militias to extend the regime's influence. The word Iran is a cognate form of Aryan, the abbreviation IRGC is a cognate form of Stürmabteilung (or SA), the term Supreme Guide is a cognate form of either Shah or Führer or maybe both, and they hate Jews Zionists Jews. Their economy is based on the production of oil and vitriol...
without first obtaining the approval of Congress, except in self-defense.

The measure was defeated 50 to 40, ensuring that the measure would not get the 60 needed to pass the Republican-majority Senate as an amendment to an annual defense policy bill.

Ten senators did not vote.

The bill, the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, passed the Senate on Thursday, but Senate leaders made the unusual decision to allow the amendment vote on Friday after a handful of Republicans joined Democrats in calling for debate on the matter.

They also agreed that the voting, which began at 5 a.m. EDT, would last through most of the day to allow Democrats running for president to return from a debate in Miami. The vote concluded 10 hours later, at 3 p.m. EDT.

Republican opponents of the legislation argued it would impose unnecessary restrictions on Trump if he faced a threat from Iran.

Supporters said it was necessary to ensure that Congress retains its constitutional right to authorize the use of military force and to lessen the chance of a miscalculation that could plunge the country into prolonged conflict.
Posted by:trailing wife

#5  #2 - our Herb!â„¢ decries any immediate response activity as push back without a full Congressional Hearing. Whose silver do you take, Judas?
Posted by: Frank G   2019-06-29 16:44  

#4  that would go against their grain, so no they don't remeber reading the here tw
Posted by: chris   2019-06-29 15:46  

#3  It’s not their naval infantry we need to worry about. It’s their perfectly legal residents and dual citizens (both Iranian a d Lebanese Shiites) who have been undergoing skills training while visiting the cousins back in the Olde Country and casing America for targets for two generations that is the very real concern. The Tsarnaev brothers were amateurs; these people are professionals.

We’ve arrested two of them recently. You both may recall reading about it here at Rantburg.
Posted by: trailing wife   2019-06-29 13:06  

#2  Oh God no, we can't have the people's will being represented in government. Starting wars is the neocon specialty and they know quite well nobody outside of DC supports them.
Posted by: Herb McCoy   2019-06-29 12:28  

#1  Oh, yeah, like I feel real threatened by Iran. I'm just waiting for their naval infantry to storm the shores of the Atlantic and come right to my house and ask for a cup of sugar.
Posted by: DooDahMan   2019-06-29 09:23  

00:00