You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Trump revives ICE raid threat, blasts judge who ruled against border wall
2019-06-30
[FOXNEWS] President Trump vowed Saturday to "immediately" appeal a judge’s ruling blocking funding for his border wall, while reviving threats to proceed with stalled deportation raids as soon as a week from now.

The president discussed his immigration plans as part of a wide-ranging presser following the G-20 summit in Osaka, Japan.

His administration, just after notching a win with the passage of a $4.6 billion bill to address the humanitarian crisis along the U.S.-Mexico border, was dealt a blow Friday when a Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party, judge barred Trump from tapping $2.5 billion in military funding to build high-priority segments of the border wall in California, Arizona and New Mexico. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. in Oakland acted in two lawsuits filed by California and by activists who contended the money transfer was unlawful and construction would pose environmental threats.

"We're immediately appealing it and we think we'll win the appeal," Trump said at his presser, calling the decision a disgrace. "There was no reason that that should have happened."

Meanwhile,
...back at the pie fight, Bella grabbed the cocoanut cream...
the president made clear that despite the passage of the aid package in Congress, he plans to move forward with controversial Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids absent a deal on reforming the asylum process, which he described as unlikely.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Or maybe the trafficking, drug and prostitution industry pays them. Once appointed, it's not like these judges can be removed by democrats, so there's no reason for them to play their stupid games. There's really no reason why the judiciary would intervene with this kind of activism unless they were invested somehow in the criminal enterprise being carried out. There's also the ongoing attempt to 'colorize' America against the will of the majority, by persons of color in any office. They'll go to any length to erode the executive mandate and reduce border security.
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-06-30 10:21  

#1  These judges are constipated fools bound up with Obama rhetoric.
Posted by: Dale   2019-06-30 10:02  

00:00