| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government |
| FCC commissioner blasts carriers for failure to fight robocalls |
| 2019-07-12 |
| [THEVERGE] Carriers have been slow to address the growing robocall problem, but the Federal Communications Commission may be about to force their hand. In a letter to fourteen US carriers, FCC Commissioner Geoffrey Starks today called out the confusing and often ineffective options available to consumers for fighting automated spam calls, and threatened regulatory action if the carriers do not improve. "Despite historically clamoring for new tools, it does not appear that all providers have acted with haste to deploy opt-out robocall blocking services," Starks told the carriers. "The Commission spoke clearly: we expect opt-out call blocking services to be offered to consumers for free. Reviewing the substance of these responses, by and large, carriers’ plans for these services are far from clear." In June, the FCC voted to allow carriers to block robocalls by default, and pushed carriers to adopt protections using the STIR/SHAKEN protocol before the end of the year. In response to that order, Commissioner Starks asked telecoms to inform the Commission of their plans to offer free robocall-blocking services by default. But the responses to that request, published today alongside Starks’ letter, show a range of confusing and obscure tools. AT&T released its own default robocall-blocking system (dubbed "Call Protect") on July 9th, making it the default setting for all newly installed lines. T-Mobile’s default "Scam ID" system attempts to identify robocalls, but users must opt into the more comprehensive "Scam Block" service. (Both products are free.) Comcast took a similar line, telling Starks that it offers "a range of free robocall mitigation tools that its customers may opt in to using," although it’s unclear which of those tools will take advantage of the FCC’s new mandate to proactively block robocalls. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #8 I've had so many calls lately about being "randomly selected" to go on some groovy vacation in Mexico or Central America. Scum bags spoof their phone number as if it is from my area code. Microbes. |
| Posted by: DooDahMan 2019-07-12 23:15 |
| #7 just took Ancestry DNA test - English/Welsh/Irish/Norwegian/Basque. .... No Chinese |
| Posted by: Frank G 2019-07-12 19:58 |
| #6 #4: Frank, it must be your name. Very close to many Chinese names. /s I get the same, except they usually want to argue about it. I do have a Chinese name, but no Chinese heritage, and no Chinese language skills. |
| Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2019-07-12 16:43 |
| #5 I just don't answer any call unless I recognize the caller on the caller ID. I figure if it's a legitimate call, they'll leave a message. |
| Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2019-07-12 14:01 |
| #4 I've lately been getting robocalls in Chinese (?) ostensibly from NYC. They leave a 10-30 second VM in Chinese. What's the strategy when I can't even understand your spam gibberish? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2019-07-12 11:38 |
| #3 The government would want 14 cents of the 10, P2k. Bureaucratic costs and all that. |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2019-07-12 10:06 |
| #2 Keep it simple stupid. Allow residential phone 'owners' to enroll in a program that every call to their number will be charged 10 cents. Three cents for the phone company, three cents for the government, and four cents for the owner. Who could object? /rhet question |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-07-12 07:10 |
| #1 I just belch into the phone when these calls come in. It makes me wish I had a bottle of Schweppes ginger ale (the highest belch quotient drink out there) and a few seconds while the call's coming in to uncork an ear burster. |
| Posted by: Raj 2019-07-12 01:17 |