You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
CA Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump’s Asylum Ban, Calling It ‘Arbitrary And Capricious’
2019-07-26
[TALKINGPOINTSMEMO] A the Socialist paradise of San Francisco
...where God struck dead Anton LaVey, home of the Sydney Ducks, ruled by Vigilance Committee from 1859 through 1867, reliably and volubly Democrat since 1964...
 judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States...
’s asylum ban after determining that it was "inconsistent with the existing asylum laws."
Assumed office: January 18, 2013
Appointed by: Barack Obama
According to Politico, U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar called the ban on asylum seekers who come to the U.S.-Mexico border through a third country "arbitrary and capricious."

Tigar’s decision came just hours after a D.C.-based district judge upheld the ban, nullifying that earlier Trump victory.
Posted by:Fred

#7  This guy is already owned and being blackmailed. Most of them are.
Posted by: Fat Bob Javish1936   2019-07-26 18:06  

#6  Amazing how one unelected judge somewhere can overrule all elected officials.

This isn't what I learned in high school civics class.
Posted by: Tom   2019-07-26 15:38  

#5  Judges from foreign lands should not dictate law enforcement measures in the United States.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-07-26 13:01  

#4  Again, I would ignore this fucktard if I was Trump.
Posted by: DarthVader   2019-07-26 12:53  

#3  I'm thinking a GoFundMe campaign or its non-pozzed equivalent needs to be started to fund digging into the history of every bench-sitter.

Then either blackmail them into making the correct judgments, or get them removed by revealing their most embarrassing secrets.

Start with Roberts.

Clearly, going through proper channels and doing things by the book has become a sucker bet.
Posted by: charger   2019-07-26 12:45  

#2  Applying treaties as written is "capricious" ? Impeach this judge.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2019-07-26 07:09  

#1  I would like the Supreme Court and Congress state that the Border is NOT part of individual states. No more "Judge shopping" --- The US Congress (get a law passed, stupid!) or, possibly, the Washington D.C. Court are the only places that "have standing".
Posted by: magpie   2019-07-26 00:58  

00:00