Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Lindsey Graham Politely Explains to Idiot Reporters Why He needs an AR-15 |
2019-08-12 |
[PJMEDIA] A favorite question that the anti-gun crowd likes to ask is "Why does anyone need an AR-15?" Sen. Lindsey Graham ...soft-spoken senator from South Carolina, former best buddy of John MaverickMcCain. Since McCain's demise, Graham has become more outspoken, more Republican and more of a supporter of President Trump. The speech he gave in support of Brett Kavanaugh was downright manly and really cheesed off the Dems... (R-S.C.) has a very practical answer to that, which he offered to news hounds on Friday. The New York Post: Sen. Lindsey Graham knocked down the idea of banning semi-automatic weapons nearly identical to those used by soldiers on the off chance a hurricane slams into his South Carolina town. "Here’s a scenario that I think is real: There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything," the Republican politician told news hounds aboard Air Force One. A news hound asked if he meant looters. "Yeah, people, they’re not going to come to the AR-15 home," Graham responded. "Well, I think if you show up on the porch with an AR-15, they’ll probably go down the street." That's a very sound point. No matter where you live, you can come up with a legitimate argument for owning an AR-15 for self-defense. Of course, no one ever wants to be in a situation where they have to, but the peace of mind is a gift. Related: Lindsey Graham: 2019-06-23 Iran Calls Trump's Bluff The President is caught between hawkish goals and dovish means. Lindsey Graham: 2019-06-20 Second ex-Senate staffer charged in aiding doxxing of GOP senators Lindsey Graham: 2019-06-15 Graham: Why Aren't Democrats Outraged Over Hillary Hiring A Foreign Agent To Dig Up Dirt? |
Posted by:Fred |
#8 Because the same folks that want to take our weapons worship a failed political system that killed millions of their own citizens. |
Posted by: ruprecht 2019-08-12 16:00 |
#7 "Because I %$#@ing WANT to" Aspirations can be motivating, but in terms of the Second Amendment, the correct answer is "Because we can..." |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2019-08-12 13:04 |
#6 A rational response... Personally I prefer the "Because I %$#@ing WANT to" approach. |
Posted by: Mercutio 2019-08-12 12:56 |
#5 (cough)yes(cough) |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2019-08-12 08:33 |
#4 Well Frank, other than a few bits you can't see it is right. |
Posted by: AlanC 2019-08-12 08:17 |
#3 "Nearly identical" |
Posted by: Frank g 2019-08-12 07:28 |
#2 Everyone knows "looters" is a dog whistle. /sarc |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2019-08-12 06:33 |
#1 'Senator Graham Says Gun Violence linked to Climate !' 'Weapon of War Advocates hide behind Climate Change induced weather patterns. Time to Abolish both ?' 'Senator Graham has an AR-15 and he will use it to drive away people asking for aid in calamity. "I will send them running down the street" he says.' All is SARC/ by the way ☺ |
Posted by: Dron66046 2019-08-12 03:24 |