| Submit your comments on this article |
| Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia |
| Evidence? Russia's Nuclear-Powered Doomsday Missile Blew Up Last Week (Updated) |
| 2019-08-13 |
| [TheDrive] Seven personnel from a major nuclear weapons research laboratory died in the mysterious incident at a test site in northwestern Russia. Rumors and speculation continue to swirl around a radiological accident last week at a missile test site in northwestern Russia even as officials held a memorial service today for those who died in the incident. The Kremlin has now acknowledged that the incident killed at least seven scientists and other personnel from a major state nuclear research laboratory, who were working on a system that included a small nuclear reactor at the time. This same lab is linked to the development of a nuclear-powered cruise missile called Burevestnik and U.S. intelligence officials are reportedly increasingly of the view that one of these weapons, or a test article related to it, exploded in this mishap. Details remain scarce about Burevestnik and how it works, but the most prominent working theory is that its main propulsion source is a nuclear ramjet. A weapon in this configuration would use rocket motor potentially liquid-fueled, which would explain the source of the explosion in this accident to boost it to the optimal speed for the ramjet to work. After that, air would pass over the nuclear reactor and get heated before passing through an exhaust nozzle at the rear to produce thrust. This, in principle, would give the weapon virtually unlimited range and a maximum flying time measured in days or weeks. U.S. President Donald Trump appears to have confirmed that the U.S. Intelligence Community has at least strong suspicions that a Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missile, or a prototype thereof, was involved in the accident last week. Trump Tweeted about the incident late on Aug. 12, 2019, describing it using the NATO nickname for the weapon, "Skyfall." Previous reports have identified this moniker, but no U.S. or other NATO officials have used it publicly before, suggesting that the social media post followed a formal briefing on the topic. |
| Posted by:Woodrow |
| #7 Probably why Trump wants us out of the treaty with them. |
| Posted by: gorb 2019-08-13 23:56 |
| #6 Flying nuclear reactor, carrying weaponized and reactor fuel. What could go wrong ? Best line of the morning. |
| Posted by: Woodrow 2019-08-13 09:46 |
| #5 unless I'm missing something, this seems like a truly idiotic concept "Since nuclear power gave it almost unlimited range, the missile could cruise in circles over the ocean until ordered "down to the deck" for its supersonic dash to targets in the Soviet Union." IRL the devices range would be very much limited not by fuel but by the extreme stress of hypersonic flight at low altitudes in dense air. |
| Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2019-08-13 08:20 |
| #4 Flying nuclear reactor, carrying weaponized and reactor fuel. What could go wrong ? 9M730 Burevestnik |
| Posted by: Dron66046 2019-08-13 05:02 |
| #3 The US prototyped a nuclear powered cruise missile in the 1950's. Decided it posed a bigger danger to ourselves than the Soviets. No way to safely test it. Project Pluto |
| Posted by: Dino Protector of the Nebraskans7894 2019-08-13 04:35 |
| #2 At least Putt Putt didn't implode an entire mountain like Pudgy did. |
| Posted by: Varmint Splat1454 2019-08-13 01:54 |
| #1 so this weapon would require a chemical fuel engine to get it to high speed as well as a nuke engine to get it to a super speed and keep it there missile would be pretty heavy unless I'm missing something, this seems like a truly idiotic concept |
| Posted by: lord garth 2019-08-13 01:19 |