You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Study blames non-genetic factors, including environment, upbringing, personality, and nurture for gayeness
2019-08-30
[PJ] Recent polls have shown that most Americans believe that homosexuals are "born that way" rather than become gay as the result of environmental factors. In fact, perpetuating the belief that sexual orientation is innate has been crucial to the gay rights movement. According to the most recent Gallup Poll on the subject, 88 percent of people who believe homosexuals are "born that way" support the legality of same-sex marriage, while only 39 percent of those who believe homosexuality is the result of environmental factors support the legality of same-sex marriage.

So, what happens when science proves that homosexuals aren’t "born that way"? Perhaps we’ll find out. A new comprehensive scientific study of the biological roots of sexual orientation released Thursday proved that there no "gay gene" and that genetic factors are insignificant in determining sexual orientation.
Posted by:Besoeker

#12  Arrested by Roman cachet
(Say what? "RSVP?"),
His little gray cells
Resonating like bells
Rung by lightning, unmarked but touché,
Was Hercule-- er, David Suchet.
Posted by: Whomong Henbane9553   2019-08-30 23:56  

#11  The study is right. There didn't have to be one, since this was proven and established in the early 20th century itself. Back then, science was about investigation, on a case by case basis. Rigorous application of logic to real subjective experiences, even if the study contained only a few hundred subjects. You may prove a truth again and again with different disciplines though.

These days, science is all about data. Some of science is statistics, but it is not all statistics.

For example, there can be 'givens' in science. Like the presence of the efferent nerve bundles in the human sex organs (of both sexes) and their absence in the ass is a given. Although the prostate features some similarity to the female para-urethral glands, to excite them doesn't require penetration into the rectal cavity, which is an excretory orifice. This is basic biology. But there are no givens in statistics, because it's concerned with changing behavior, evolving/devolving biology.

Gay parents, and those with predilections for that 'love yourself, none greater than you' culture exhibit traits and symptoms of the sickness of exhibitionist hypersexuality. In short, they are restless, insatiable and experiment. And their children witness this behavior, as a matter of fact. When the archetypes for success and achievement are conflated with selfishness and wanton hedonism, the children are bound to follow that ideal. Sexual experimentation has become part of the archetype. Over several generations the traits may even affect genetic memory.

There's no such thing as 'sexual orientation'. It is a biological orientation, designed and selected for by nature over millennia of evolution after the simple single-cell thingy. So when you meet an LGBTQer, a gender-fluid thingy, you have met an adopted cousin of the ancient amoeba.

Speaking spiritually, this phenomenon in families is seeded by the deeply ingrained narcissistic tendencies that arise when people who were once made aware of the Truth, rejected it for more social gospels and colorful theories by know-it-all preachers of human greatness over God. You know the type. Seemingly intelligent men, with a vicious hatred for faith and the unseen, because it eluded them and they couldn't own it.

"...because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.

Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man..."

"Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting..."
the rest of this text is a list of faults found exclusively in the liberal milieu. It practically describes the modern blue voter. - Paul, Romans 1





Posted by: Dron66046   2019-08-30 16:23  

#10  Last thirty years, dammit.
Posted by: Threash Grumble4619   2019-08-30 15:50  

#9  Adam Sandler copy room boy

Wasn't that [looks it up] Rob Schneider (for whom, while I wasn't watching (the last years or so) my memory has apparently been trying to substitute Norm Macdonald... couple more years and I'd have been sure it was him)?
Posted by: Threash Grumble4619   2019-08-30 15:48  

#8  So a combination of 5 different genetic areas explains between 8 and 25 percent of homosexuality. If I had ever tried to present a scientific experiment with explanatory values this low, I'd have been laughed out of the class.
Posted by: Tom   2019-08-30 14:33  

#7  Marvin Gayeness
Posted by: Frank G   2019-08-30 14:09  

#6  Gaiety
Posted by: Lex   2019-08-30 13:50  

#5  Will Gayoom fit ?
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-08-30 13:27  

#4  Channeling Adam Sandler copy room boy: Gay meister, Gayalicious, Gayaroon...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-08-30 13:17  

#3  Gayitude. Gaylicity. Gayhood.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-08-30 13:03  

#2  Gayeness

Oh, I thought this was about what caused Trouble Man, or what makes you sing "Can I get a witness," etc
Never mind
Posted by: Lex   2019-08-30 07:44  

#1  I just think of them as defectors from the war between sexes
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-08-30 04:39  

00:00