You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pentagon chief says Vindman should not fear Army retaliation
2019-11-12
WASHINGTON (AP) ‐ Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Monday that an Army officer has no reason to fear retribution for testifying before Congress in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.

Esper was asked about potential retribution for Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman during a trip to New York City. The defense secretary said the Pentagon "has protections for whistleblowers" who report waste, fraud or abuse.

He said Vindman or any other whistleblower "shouldn’t have any fear of retaliation," according to a transcript of the exchange released by online publication Defense One.

Vindman is the Ukraine specialist at the White House’s National Security Council who was on the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskiy. Vindman testified about concerns that Trump was delaying military aid to the Eastern European country while pressing the country to investigate his political rivals.

That phone call, and Trump’s request for a "favor" from Ukraine are the basis of the impeachment inquiry.

According to the Defense One transcript, Esper was asked what he would tell service members who might wonder if Vindman’s career is in jeopardy and whether their own careers would be at risk if they blew the whistle on waste, fraud or abuse.

Esper responded by saying the Pentagon "has protections for whistleblowers -- they’re guaranteed in law. And he shouldn’t have any fear of retaliation. That’s DoD’s position," referring to the Department of Defense.
Related:
Vindman: 2019-11-11 Azerbaijan Encroaches Into Georgian Territory
Vindman: 2019-11-11 Alexander Vindman Gets The Boot
Vindman: 2019-11-11 Top US military official says 500-ish troops to remain in Syria
Posted by:Besoeker

#18  How about " Ekalaka Mini-Mutes Radar Site, Carter County, Montana, 45.6667°N -104.3669°W " ...
A friend once told me that Alaska is a "hardship post with double points..." so why not find some place in the CONUS where you have to drive 50+ miles to buy a beer?
Posted by: magpie   2019-11-12 20:09  

#17  The Mash House!

Being posted to McMurdo, on the other hand...

McMurdo is a treat.
We do need some RADAR watchers on Shemya though.
Posted by: Skidmark   2019-11-12 17:04  

#16  Ref #13: Pentagon will not retaliate. They will follow the UCMJ and nail him for being a criminal...

Sadly, I'll bet you a Porterhouse at the Mash House in Fayetteville this never happens.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-11-12 16:32  

#15  When is enforcing the law retaliation? [Scroll up to Liberals Hate the Police but love their Gestapol]
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-11-12 15:48  

#14  Vindman decided to become a whistleblower because he disagreed with Trump's policy. Vindman does not make foreign policy. You could say he tried to usurp the Constitutional authority of the President. He ought to be brought up on charges.
Posted by: JohnQC   2019-11-12 15:23  

#13  Pentagon will not retaliate. They will follow the UCMJ and nail him for being a criminal...
Posted by: 49 Pan   2019-11-12 13:59  

#12  REMFs are a serious problem in any military, MM.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-11-12 10:26  

#11  He's in a position now where anything he doesn't like about his treatment by the Army or DoD will be seen as "harassment" or "retaliation." The military better figure out how to prevent an entire class of guys like this or next thing you know they will be running the place.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2019-11-12 10:17  

#10  Fair trial, quick hanging.
Justice deserved isn't retaliation or retribution, it's just justice.
Posted by: One Eyed Tsar   2019-11-12 10:00  

#9  Retaliation, no. But personally I'd like a word or two on exactly how and why he somehow does not have to work within the chain of command, you know like EVERYBODY else in uniform.
Posted by: Cesare   2019-11-12 09:46  

#8  Alex Vindman Is Living, Breathing Proof That The Deep State Exists, And It Is Corrupt
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-11-12 08:48  

#7  Vindman has nothing to fear for being a whistleblower. However, he is not a whistleblower. He is an officer who disobeyed a legal order. For that alone he should be courtmartialed.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2019-11-12 08:33  

#6  Insubordination. Give him the MacArthur treatment.
Posted by: Lemuel Prince of the Platypi5893   2019-11-12 05:48  

#5  Being posted to McMurdo, on the other hand...
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-11-12 05:48  

#4  Unless it is something new, the military does not have a "whisleblower" program, per se. The correct venue for issues of concern is the 'chain of command,' Inspector General, Waste Fraud & Abuse Hotline, or Staff Judge Advocate (SJA).

Again, unless something has changed in the past 20 years, which is entirely possible.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-11-12 05:19  

#3  who report waste, fraud or abuse

How does it fits what Vindman did?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-11-12 02:32  

#2  He is a spy.
Posted by: Varmint Splat1454   2019-11-12 02:27  

#1  This 'protection for whistleblowers' thing. Isn't it something detrimental to military or intelligence directives ? Does it even extend to the relationship between an O-5 and the CinC ?
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-11-12 02:25  

00:00