You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
NYT Columnist Tom Friedman Demands Pompeo Defy Trump Or Be Condemned To Hell
2019-11-26
[federalist] In Tom Friedman's world, a Cabinet officer's faithful execution of a president's policies after private disagreement is both 'cowardly' and 'slimy,' not to mention cause for eternal damnation.
The Dictator-Loving Friedman has lost his shit mind
In 42-plus years of analyzing lawyers' briefs, I have gained some experience in spotting written advocacy that resorts to a variety of mechanisms to camouflage a weak argument. Sometimes authors use personal attacks and inflammatory but baseless accusations to cover up the weakness of their argument.

So it is with political journalists and advocates (an overlapping set, to be sure). Tom Friedman, The New York Times’ resident "intellectual" foreign affairs columnist, demonstrates this technique in spades in his recent unhinged personal attack on Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for not publicly disagreeing with President Trump's decision to recall Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovich.

Friedman's charge is that Pompeo's failure to voice his public disagreement with Trump's decision shows that even though Pompeo finished No. 1 in his class at West Point ‐ a composite of academic, leadership, and physical fitness rankings ‐ "he must have flunked all his courses on ethics and leadership." Friedman lards up his baseless argument with inflammatory, red-meat personal attacks that can fairly be described as sophomoric, in the sense that they are more typical of something written by an inexperienced but passionate youth, rather than a serious man.

Thus, Friedman's analysis is that Pompeo is "cowardly" and "slimy," he must have "failed or skipped" all West Point's classes on ethics and leadership, and his failure to behave as Friedman would demand is "one of the most shameful things I have ever seen in 40 years of covering U.S. diplomacy." He has "the mark of Cain on his forehead" and it "will not wash off." Continuing his biblical references, Friedman assures us it is really a "simple" matter: Pompeo will "lose his soul."

Well, what on Earth is the basis for damning Pompeo's soul to hell? It is this, in Friedman's words:

Though he reportedly argued privately to the president to keep Yovanovitch in place, Pompeo faithfully executed Trump's order without uttering a word to defend his ambassador's reputation in public.

In the Friedman world, a Cabinet officer's faithful execution of a president's policies after private disagreement is both "cowardly" and "slimy," not to mention cause for eternal damnation.
Posted by:Frank G

#10  To believe in a hell means you believe in a god (other than yourself). It's hard to think he has any grasp of the implications.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-11-26 19:15  

#9  Politics is his religion, so this is no surprise.
Posted by: charger   2019-11-26 17:28  

#8  Good thing he doesn't get to decide who goes to hell.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2019-11-26 17:14  

#7  Wanna bet that if the parties were reversed Freedman would be yelling heretic and building a bonfire if anyone did what he is saying here?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2019-11-26 16:28  

#6  Well, he IS an economist.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-11-26 16:08  

#5   Always confuse him with the other one, the economist.

The way you tell them apart is that one is mostly wrong while the other is wrong all the time.
Posted by: SteveS   2019-11-26 15:48  

#4  Always confuse him with the other one, the economist.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-11-26 15:34  

#3  Sounds like Friedman needs to be writing from Tehran.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-11-26 15:32  

#2  Certainly not me.
Posted by: Tom   2019-11-26 15:21  

#1  Tom who?
Posted by: Lex   2019-11-26 13:56  

00:00