You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
U.S. Attorney John Durham Responds To FISA Report, Hints At What’s To Come In Criminal Investigation Into Origins Of Russia Probe
2019-12-10
[DAILYWIRE] United States Attorney John Durham responded to Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz’s report on Monday by stating that it was incorrect due to the limited information that it was based on whereas Durham’s criminal investigation is not limited in scope and appears to have uncovered a lot more than Horowitz did.

“I have the utmost respect for the mission of the Office of Inspector General and the comprehensive work that went into the report prepared by Mr. Horowitz and his staff,” Durham said in a statement.

“However, our investigation is not limited to developing information from within component parts of the Justice Department,” Durham continued. “Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

Related:
John Durham: 2019-12-06 VDH 'When Our Guardians Fail Us'
John Durham: 2019-12-02 Court Filing: Obama Holdover Heading Office Under Investigation for ‘Illegally Leaked' Classified Document
John Durham: 2019-11-24 The First Glimpse into Horowitz's FISA-Abuse Report
Related:
Michael Horowitz: 2019-12-07 Inspector General Ramps Up Investigations of FBI Employees
Michael Horowitz: 2019-12-06 VDH 'When Our Guardians Fail Us'
Michael Horowitz: 2019-12-05 DOJ watchdog finds FBI omitted details about Steele dossier in FISA renewal applications
Posted by:Fred

#1  "we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.”

Hear, hear.

The statements in the report supporting predication were very strange.

How could such a carnival of error, mishandling and and FISA abuse possibly co-exist with be proper predication? Has that ever happened?
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-10 01:48  

00:00