You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Bring In the National Guard to Enforce Virginia Gun Control, Says Dem Gov. Northham
2019-12-13
[Guns America Digest] As you may have heard, Virginia Democrats have promised to pass new gun-control legislation in 2020.

And as you also may have heard, this flagrant assault on the 2A rights of Virginians has created a groundswell of backlash as more than 75 of the state’s 95 counties have passed resolutions declaring themselves, "Second Amendment Sanctuaries," meaning they will not observe nor enforce any law that infringes on one’s right to keep and bear arms.

This face-off between pro-gun forces at the municipal and grassroots level and their anti-gun opposition in the Legislature raises an obvious question, who wins when the rubber meets the road? Say the Dems do pass all eight proposals (see list below), what happens when a large percentage of the population does not come to heel.

Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam said while there will not be "retaliation" there will be "consequences" for those who openly flout the law.

"There’s not going to be retaliation. That’s not what I’m about. I’m about making Virginia safer," said Northam on Wednesday.

"If we have constitutional laws on the books and law enforcement officers are not enforcing those laws on the books, then there are going to be consequences," he continued. "But I’ll cross that bridge if and when we get to it."
Posted by:Besoeker

#16  "If we have constitutional laws on the books and law enforcement officers are not enforcing those laws on the books, then there are going to be consequences," he continued."

You mean like not notifying ICE of apprehended illegals?
Posted by: bbrewer126   2019-12-13 21:05  

#15  Damn. Revolutions are what happens in other countries, right?

Read a post awhile back that stated approximately 50% of the NG would not follow (at what levels I don't know) an order to fire upon American civilians.
Posted by: Anomalous Sources   2019-12-13 21:01  

#14  My oldest son lives in VA...I asked him about this and he said "got it covered Dad.
I live in California so we understand the mentality of gun control morons...
Posted by: crazyhorse   2019-12-13 19:08  

#13  more than 75 of the state’s 95 counties have passed resolutions declaring themselves, "Second Amendment Sanctuaries


Time is overdue to boot Blackface Northram out of office.
Posted by: JohnQC   2019-12-13 13:13  

#12  None of your arguments matter so long as the governor gets to signal his virtue.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2019-12-13 12:49  

#11  (I'm referring to the cluelessness of the Governor of Virginia)
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-13 12:06  

#10  ^ = yet another example of how clueless our current class of idiot politicians is about constitutional law
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-13 12:06  

#9  Despite all the discussion of using the National Guard for law enforcement actions people see to remember that virtually all of the Guard equipment and pay comes from the Federal government. A phone call and signature by the President can federalize the Guard and remove all command and control from the states hands. Remember when George Wallace was using the Guard to resist integration and they we federalized on the spot by Eisenhower.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2019-12-13 11:58  

#8  "But I’ll cross that bridge if and when we get to it."

Interesting choice of words, sir.
Posted by: Francis Smith   2019-12-13 11:37  

#7  VA vote for him, they voted for this. He is not a moron, he is doing what the voters asked. The true morons in this game are the citizens of VA, they brought this jackass into power.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2019-12-13 11:14  

#6  I think Gov Two-Face is confused on who make up the National Guard. It could just be him staring down the end of a gun barrel.
Posted by: Snusotle the Lesser4227   2019-12-13 09:56  

#5  Always remember the instructive case of the Arizona traffic cameras. They were roundly criticized as being overly aggressive and left the ticketed driver with no legal chance for appeal.

The citizens of Arizona simply stopped paying any and all tickets that were issued by camera. Non- plussed by a revolt of the masses, the governor had his chief LEO figure out just what it would take to get them 'aire peons back on a paying basis. It was thought that it would require every LEO in the state. State, county, municipal, federal, every last one just to get the ticket racket back on line. Truly would you need to have a heart of stone not to be convulsed with mirth at the news conference with the 4 nearly tearful state troopers formerly in charge announcing the program's demise.

Moral of the story, there are more of us than there are of them.
Posted by: Cesare   2019-12-13 09:54  

#4  This was tried back in 1775. It didn't work so well for the people in charge, if memory serves correctly.
Posted by: DarthVader   2019-12-13 09:53  

#3  and NO Sanctuary Cities for Illegals?
Posted by: Frank G   2019-12-13 09:52  

#2  "If we have constitutional laws on the books and law enforcement officers are not enforcing those laws on the books, then there are going to be consequences," he continued."

Problem solved right there. Confiscation is patently unconstitutional. I refer you to a little known section, we the deplorables, call 2A.
Posted by: Warthog   2019-12-13 09:50  

#1  What a maroon. Who do you think keep private arms in their own home?

What are you going to do if those members reject your illegal orders? Call Trump for federal troops? I can hear the laughter at the other end of the line.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-12-13 09:08  

00:00