You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Impeachment markup heats up as Dems invoke MLK, Nadler says 'we cannot rely on an election' to oust Trump
2019-12-13
[FOXNEWS] The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday night began the first phase of a fiery
...a single two-syllable word carrying connotations of both incoherence and viciousness. A fiery delivery implies an audience of rubes and yokels, preferably forming up into a mob...
"markup" process for the two articles of impeachment against President Trump that they have settled on, barreling toward a final floor vote even as moderate Democrats in GOP-leaning districts have floated the idea of backing down in favor of a censure resolution.

Almost immediately, the evening proceedings broke out into heated disagreement, as the panel's top Democrat declared that it would be unsafe to wait until the 2020 election to remove Trump, and another claimed Trump's actions were an "affront to the memory of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr." Meanwhile,
...back at the railroad tracks, Little Nell tried to kick her bound feet and scream post the snotty handkerchief Scarface Al had stuff into her mouth...
the ranking Republican slammed Democrats for attacking Ukraine's leader because he had undercut their case against Trump, which has foundered in several battleground polls.

"We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems, when the president threatens the very integrity of that election," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said in his opening statement,
No, dear boy, you can’t. Because we are going to elect him by a landslide in eleven short months from now.
claiming Trump's discussions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about Joe and Hunter Biden's dealings in the country, and the White House's temporary withholding of military aid to Ukraine, constituted an "urgent" threat to national security.

"This committee now owes it to the American people to give these articles careful attention," Nadler added at the beginning of the markup for the impeachment articles, which included obstruction of Congress and abuse of power.

Related:
Jerry Nadler: 2019-12-11 The Fall of the Deep State and 1989's Fall of Communism
Jerry Nadler: 2019-12-11 Dems’ impeachment absurdities are making them look like the threat to democracy
Jerry Nadler: 2019-12-10 Louie Gohmert goes off during hearing, stops Nadler in his tracks with final punch
Related:
Volodymyr Zelensky: 2019-12-06 Impeachment is the perfect opportunity for Trump and the GOP to lay out all the evidence against Ukraine and Joe Biden
Volodymyr Zelensky: 2019-11-29 Why Are Democrats Shrinking From the Impeachment Fight?
Volodymyr Zelensky: 2019-11-26 A dozen document troves that could change the Ukraine scandal if Trump released them
Related:
Hunter Biden: 2019-12-09 Joe Biden says Hunter will not engage in foreign business if he wins 2020 race
Hunter Biden: 2019-12-09 Former Ukraine Prosecutor Shokin: Joe Biden "Outraged We Seized Burisma Assets", Could No Longer Pay His Son…
Hunter Biden: 2019-12-06 Sudan PM sees progress on US terror list removal
Posted by:Fred

#11  Wasn't MLK a Republican?
Posted by: JohnQC   2019-12-13 23:31  

#10  Nadler says 'we cannot rely on an election' to oust Trump

Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander. Watch what you wish for, your Nadlership. Projection is not a good thing.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2019-12-13 21:17  

#9  The Democratic Party sounds so ... democratic. "We must have a coup d'état against an elected President because we are afraid the voters will reelect him!"
Posted by: magpie   2019-12-13 15:09  

#8  Ah right. I knew it was in my Little Red Book somewhere. Won't happen again, Comrade.
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-13 08:12  

#7  Uhhh, maybe 'enemies domestic", Lex?
Posted by: Bobby   2019-12-13 08:10  

#6  So we're now hearing from Democrats of all persuasions - new, old, left, moderate, morons and sophisticated alike - that when it comes to OrangeMan, our Constitution is meaningless.

A Virginia (D) tells her constituents in effect that for OrangeMan there is no such thing as the Constitutional presumption of innocence.

Schifferbrains and Nodding-offer tell the nation that when it comes to OrangeMan, elections must not be tolerated.

The entire Dem establishment agrees that Constitutional provisions against entrapment, domestic spying, illegal search and seizure etc do not apply to anyone connected to the Evil OrangeMan.

Q: Where in the Constitution is this all-nullifying OrangeMan Clause?
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-13 07:41  

#5  I wouldn't put assassination or military coup attempts beyond them at this point.

May God protect the man and his family.
Posted by: Dron66046   2019-12-13 07:30  

#4  These Shitshow Clowns know their turnout math.

They see the writing on the wall: 5% minority unemployment + 35% black & Hispanic support for Trump = landslide in November.
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-13 07:30  

#3  I smell panic.

2020 is starting to look like a rout.
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-13 07:27  

#2  Nadler says 'we cannot rely on an election' to oust Trump

Fairly obvious what Congressman Nadler thinks of the American voter.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-12-13 07:14  

#1  They really do want a Civil War.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-12-13 07:08  

00:00