| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| The Next Nuclear Plants Will Be Small, Svelte, and Safer |
| 2019-12-15 |
| Wired via Instapundit For the last 20 years, the future of nuclear power has stood in a high bay laboratory tucked away on the Oregon State University campus in the western part of the state. Operated by NuScale Power, an Oregon-based energy startup, this prototype reactor represents a new chapter in the conflict-ridden, politically bedeviled saga of nuclear power plants. NuScale’s reactor won’t need massive cooling towers or sprawling emergency zones. It can be built in a factory and shipped to any location, no matter how remote. Extensive simulations suggest it can handle almost any emergency without a meltdown. One reason is that it barely uses any nuclear fuel, at least compared with existing reactors. It’s also a fraction of the size of its predecessors. This is good news for a planet in the grips of a climate crisis. Nuclear energy gets a bad rap in some environmentalist circles, but many energy experts and policymakers agree that splitting atoms is going to be an indispensable part of decarbonizing the world’s electricity. In the US, nuclear power accounts for about two-thirds of all clean electricity, but the existing reactors are rapidly approaching the end of their regulatory lifetimes. Only two new reactors are under construction in the US, but they’re billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule. Enter the small modular reactor, designed to allow several reactors to be combined into one unit. Need a modest amount of energy? Install just a few modules. Want to fuel a sprawling city? Tack on several more. Coming up with a suitable power plant for a wide range of situations becomes that much easier. Because they are small, these reactors can be mass-produced and shipped to any location in a handful of pieces. Perhaps most importantly, small modular reactors can take advantage of several cooling and safety mechanisms unavailable to their big brothers, which all but guarantees they won’t become the next Chernobyl. Now, all that remains is to find a name for them that yields the acronym GRETA. |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #10 "Nuclear energy gets a bad rap in some environmentalist circles" This may be the understatement of the century. |
| Posted by: Secret Master 2019-12-15 21:29 |
| #9 'DECREASING' power delivery losses. |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2019-12-15 13:48 |
| #8 The Brits have some pretty small reactors (Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor or 'AGR'), and produce about 550-mW each. These NuScale units (60-mW output each) make the AGR's look gargantuan, even if you needed the nine units to equal the same power output. The idea is that you wouldn't. These can be placed firly close to a population center, thereby reducing the 'infrastructure' costs and vastly increasing power delivery losses. And NuScale isn't the only one developing these smaller power systems. |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2019-12-15 13:47 |
| #7 More a slogan... "Generating revolutionary electricity through activism!" |
| Posted by: Large Munster1307 2019-12-15 12:47 |
| #6 Engineering the economy of scale concept in reverse when it produces a solution to work around risk factors that are geometric in progression. Brilliant ! |
| Posted by: NoMoreBS 2019-12-15 11:31 |
| #5 Good Riddance, Environmentalist Tantrum-throwing Arseholes |
| Posted by: Lex 2019-12-15 10:48 |
| #4 So will the Nevada disposal site, in the middle of where 1000 nuke weapons were tested, be open for business? Crickets chirping.... Okay... this is not real... |
| Posted by: 3dc 2019-12-15 10:42 |
| #3 ^And we have a winner. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2019-12-15 10:16 |
| #2 Green Reactor Energy Transfer Alternative? |
| Posted by: Matt 2019-12-15 10:01 |
| #1 "acronym GRETA" -- LOL -- I'm sure we can come up with something. So these small reactors will reduce carbon emissions. But how will they help dismantle the American economy and inflict suffering on the deplorables? |
| Posted by: Matt 2019-12-15 09:40 |