You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
After 184 years, Cherokees seek House delegate seat promised in treaty
2019-12-16
This is a really strange story with so many angles and issues. You have Uncle Sam the Indian Giver. You have a founding force of the Democrats Andrew Jackson. A bill signed by a president and congress. A bill that should have really been an Amendment to the Constitution so therefore signed by 2/3rds of the states. Since it wasn't, maybe it should be unconstitutional. If it is unconstitutional then is the treaty with the Cherokee Nation invalid? Is it a still-pending amendment to the constitution waiting for 2/3rds of the states to vote on it? Is there an expiration time on amendments? Oh, and the lady who would win the seat is an activist who was in political alignment with Obama. Lots of interesting questions.
[RollCall] Move poses technical and moral questions, including whether Cherokees would get ‘super vote’

Kim Teehee was an intern combing through dusty archives when she first learned of a largely forgotten agreement between her Cherokee tribe and the federal government.

More than 25 years later, that document has placed Teehee at the center of a historic reckoning of the way Congress treats Native Americans, while raising questions about what representation in Washington really means.
Posted by:3dc

#14  Some of them make damned good destroyer commanders.
Posted by: Matt   2019-12-16 18:41  

#13  3dc great read!
Posted by: Woodrow   2019-12-16 13:41  

#12  ..yep. Have two big ones in the immediate area. Watched the before and after. Far better off than when they were at the tit of the Bureau of Indians Affairs. Have a policy that basically says 'he who will not work will not eat'. The communities did it right. Biggest discovery was the power of lobbyists and their benefits.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-12-16 12:11  

#11  Would they sink or swim?

Those who were able to hire good management companies for their c@$inos might do alright.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2019-12-16 11:32  

#10  ^Sink. I live next to one and it's not a good idea.
Posted by: Secret Master   2019-12-16 10:49  

#9  What would happen if all the 'reservations' were cut free and allowed/forced to become one or more independent nations. Or a geographically disconnected 51st state? Would they sink or swim?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2019-12-16 09:51  

#8  Plenary power doctrine: Congress, and not the Executive Branch or Judicial Branch, has ultimate authority with regard to matters affecting the Indian tribes. Federal courts give greater deference to Congress on Indian matters than on other subjects.

Wiki on Tribal sovereignty in the United States

Check the numerous Acts which determined the relationships.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2019-12-16 08:52  

#7  I'm all for procrastination, but waiting 184 years to do something suggests it wasn't real high on the To Do list.
Posted by: SteveS   2019-12-16 08:47  

#6  Let them have not voting seats like Washington DC.
Posted by: ruprecht   2019-12-16 08:14  

#5  Pocahontas didn't satisfy the treaty requirement?
Posted by: JohnQC   2019-12-16 07:57  

#4  Another little problem for the Cherokees were that they were slavers and sided with the South during the Civil War, and yes they did have sex with their slaves. Watch the Black Caucus spin in circles it that comes up.
Posted by: Gomez Flugum6633   2019-12-16 07:15  

#3  How can they have tribal sovereignty for their Indian "nations" AND representation in Congress as members of the non-Indian, US nation?
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-16 07:02  

#2  Like present day USA is not tribalized enough?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2019-12-16 04:13  

#1  not satisfied with having just one Senator from MA
Posted by: lord garth   2019-12-16 04:11  

00:00