You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Ted Cruz breaks down Kevin Clinesmith Clinesmith's Doctoring of Documents re Page, CIA Asset
2019-12-23
Related:
Clinesmith: 2019-12-15 Who Apologizes to Carter Page?
Clinesmith: 2019-12-12 FBI Lawyer Doctored Email to Make Carter Page Appear as a Russian Agent Instead of a CIA Source
Clinesmith: 2019-12-10 BOMBSHELL: FBI ‘Altered' Evidence That Falsely Cast Carter Page As Russian Spy, Report Says
Posted by:Lex

#9  Clinesmith’s name surfaced previously. In 2018, GOP Congressman Mark Meadows publicly accused Clinesmith of possibly being the FBI lawyer described in the inspector general’s report as writing anti-Trump messages, including one that declared “viva le resistance.” The Times is now reporting that Clinesmith is that lawyer, known as FBI lawyer 2 in the IG’s earlier report into the Clinton email investigation.
Posted by: b   2019-12-23 16:48  

#8  I'm not sure Cruz is right in that it was great investigating

That was the disarming compliment, the feint before he slashes his unsuspecting opponent's face. Cruz is a master swordsman.
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-23 12:06  

#7  Mr. Page was the 'mole' employed to permit surveillance and incidental collection of a political campaign. A witting mole, or an unwitting mole, you decide. IMA still going with eagerly witting and complicit... hoping someone will conduct an examination of his personal banking records.

I doubt the originators of this little project ever imagined that a FISA court authorization 'deep dive' would ever take place. Even further beyond their collective imagination would be an examination of the interagency process. But guess what, here we are.

It just keeps getting interestinger and interestinger.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-12-23 11:49  

#6  "Protecting" the source from a secret court?

Sounds like perjury to me.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2019-12-23 11:35  

#5  Ref #4: I do hope the document changer goes to prison for a long time.

I doubt he or she will see any punitive action or prison time. The actions are likely to be viewed as more of a technical omission or modification employed to protect 'sources and methods.'

It is also very likely that the owning agency 'directed' the FBI to respond to the FISA court in this manner.

Just my guess.
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-12-23 11:10  

#4  I'm not sure Cruz is right in that it was great investigating. Someone at the CIA wrote a memo saying he is a source. Someone at the CIA was probably aware that the the memo was changed to say the exact opposite. Someone at the CIA probably contacted the investigators.

I do hope the document changer goes to prison for a long time.
Posted by: ruprecht   2019-12-23 10:51  

#3  The interagency process is a bit more formal. Let's just say the discussions and communiques on Mr. Page would not have ended simply as... "yes, he is a source."
Posted by: Besoeker   2019-12-23 01:52  

#2  Unbelievable.

Separately, on this topic, Cruz is really superb.
Crystal clear, sharp, powerful.

Yes, Cruz is poking a very sharp stick into the eye of the intelligence community. This little incident should be something to follow closely.
Posted by: Lex   2019-12-23 00:53  

#1  So... why isn't this guy in jail? As Ted mentioned if you or I did this with any court document we would be serving time. Why isn't he?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2019-12-23 00:05  

00:00