| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| Trump Has Changed How Iranians Do Risk Assessment |
| 2020-01-11 |
| [RedState] -You know you’ve won the battle BIGLY, when one of the major mouthpieces of the DNC, The Washington Post, publishes an opinion piece entitled: Trump wins his standoff with Iran Although the author, Mark Thiessen is a Republican who worked for President George W. Bush, that this particular,piece still graced the pages of WaPo, is telling. Here’s the lede, emphasis, mine Democrats warned that President Trump’s decision to take out Iranian terrorist mastermind Qasem Soleimani had put the United States on the path toward a cataclysmic war with Iran. They were dead wrong. Trump won his standoff with Iran. President Trump is a whole lot smarter and self aware than most people give him credit for. By redefining "proportionality," in his use of force calculations, he has introduced uncertainty into Iranian assessment of risk when considering attacks on U.S. and Allied interests. Heretofore, the Iranians (and a few other international bad actors) would make an internal risk assessment when contemplating some sort of action contrary to U.S. interests and /or harm to U.S. citizens. Until this last Friday, such an assessment was that there was little if any risk of any American action, beyond strong language at the U. N. and perhaps a few economic sanctions. Further assessment told the Iranians that in the worst case, if the U.S. used any kind of force, it would be "proportional" to the the Iranian action. Needless to say, that kind of predictability serves as no deterrent whatsoever. Enter Donald J. Trump. President Trump understands the art of negotiation and in the case of nation-states, the effective and proper use of force to achieve the just ends of these United States‐in most cases, to modify the behavior of bad state actors. He also understands people. He has figured out the mullahs too. He knows that they are corrupt, living large while their people live in penury. They are very good at encouraging martyrdom, but they certainly don’t want to personally participate. Soleimani is the first indicator that the times, they are a changin’. The left however, insists on asking, "So what did the United States get out of doing this? What’s the benefit?" My answer: What we got is a whole new way of thinking by the Iranians. Heretofore, it was their bottom feeders who took the casualties. We are now messaging their leadership that they will be held personally accountable for bad acts against America and her allies. In other words, Trump have shown MM that Great Satan is not too proud to learn from Little Satan |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #4 "The iranians have 40,000 generals commanding their million man army!" According to Wikipedia’ United States Armed Forces page, M. Murcek Total active duty strength as of February 28, 2019, was 1,359,685 servicemembers, with an additional 799,845 people in the seven reserve components.[31] Civilian Department of Defense Employees numbered at 744,005 in December 2018. The Department of Defense is the largest employer in the world[32] Apparently ours is the third largest military organization in the world, behind China and India in numbers. The question of relative effectiveness was not addressed. ;-) Also, that says nothing about the unorganized militia as defined by the Constitution. Someone at Quora posted as answer to the question about the number of American Army generals: The U.S. Army has 315 General Officers. Generals (O-7 to O-10) comprise 0.06% of the Army. There is 1 General for every 1600 Soldiers. The number of Generals is limited by US Code. See 10 U.S. Code § 526 - Authorized strength: general and flag officers on active duty. The Army is authorized a total of 231 Generals. Additionally the Secretary of Defense can authorize an additional 310 Generals or Flag Officers to serve in Joint assignments. These slots are split between uniformed services We don’t need as many generals because our corporals and sergeants regularly make decisions that require field grade officers in Third World armies. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2020-01-11 22:17 |
| #3 ..I think the Persian leader Darius had similar numbers. Another Orange Man Bad moment. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-01-11 06:55 |
| #2 Over at ZH, some maroon commented "The iranians have 40,000 generals commanding their million man army!" (never mind the absurdity of the numbers) I replied, "You are touting that as a positive?" That reply was downvoted heavily by the hate Murica always crowd... |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2020-01-11 06:28 |
| #1 ^Israel and US will handle the Iranian challenge in their own ways |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-01-11 04:55 |