You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Folks question why Fauci cheered using drug for MERS coronavirus in 2013… but now he's skeptical
2020-04-08
[BizPacReview] It’s been found that seven years ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci expressed that he was encouraged by lab tests involving a combination of drugs that included hydroxychloroquine in antiviral experiments on a SARS-like coronavirus that had emerged at the time. Some observers are seeing that as puzzling.

Fauci, NIAID director and current Coronavirus Task Force rock star, has long been widely looked to as the nation’s ultimate authority on infectious diseases. As such, his record and history of public comments are especially subject to scrutiny and critiques at a time such as the current societal upheaval sweeping the globe.

An ongoing point of contention being amplified by the media is Fauci’s cautious present-day perspective on the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19, while so many others are eager to embrace the encouraging indicators of its potential effectiveness against today’s novel coronavirus.

The Fox News hosts directed Fauci's attention to a recent Sermo poll of more than 6000 physicians in 30 countries in which 37 percent rated HCQ as the "most effective therapy" in treating the novel coronavirus.

"We don't operate on how you ‘feel,'" Fauci commented, pointing out that the survey measured feelings or opinions. "We operate on what evidence is and data is."

"Fox & Friends" also played a clip of Dr. Mehmet Cengiz Öz directly asking for Fauci's thoughts about HCQ's promise as suggested in a "Chinese study from Wuhan, reflecting statistically significant improvement in recovering from fever, from cough, and from pneumonia as well."

"That was not a very robust study," Fauci replied. "It is still possible that there is a beneficial effect, but the study that was just quoted, on a scale of strength of evidence, that's not overwhelmingly strong. It's an indication, a hint of it."

He added: "So although there is some suggestion that there is a benefit there, I think we've got to be careful that we don't make that majestic leap to assume that this is a knockout drug. We still need to do the kinds of studies that definitively prove that any intervention, not just this one, but any intervention is truly safe and effective."

"But when you don't have that information," the doctor added, "it's understandable, and I grant that … it's understandable why people may want to take something anyway, even with the slightest hint of it being effective, and I have no problem with that."

The 79-year-old Fauci has served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, having served under six U.S. presidents, beginning with Ronald Reagan.
Related:
Anthony Fauci: 2020-04-06 Did globalists Bill & Melinda purchase the Center for Disease Control (CDC) ?
Anthony Fauci: 2020-04-06 Inside the epic White House fight over hydroxychloroquine
Anthony Fauci: 2020-04-06 Louisiana governor claims he had no idea Mardi Gras in New Orleans would trigger a coronavirus outbreak
Posted by:Clem

#10  He's a Beastbot.

Can't abide the thought that this crisis and its resolution might make Trump look good.
Posted by: charger   2020-04-08 14:21  

#9  If they found that the drug didn't actually work in the long run, so taking quotes from earlier when it showed promise would be misleading.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2020-04-08 10:52  

#8  Wait. Won't the "progressives" insist that any miracle cure be placed in the public trust and not hindered by "capitalist rules?"
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-08 10:18  

#7  No. He's working with Bill Gates and big Pharm looking for a big payday. Downplaying a cheap expired patent drug.

Willing to give good odds.
Posted by: Woodrow   2020-04-08 10:04  

#6  At this point it sure looks like he is putting most of his effort into prolonging his 15 minutes of fame...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-08 08:31  

#5  those [HIV/AIDS activists] had a blanket disgust with us

BTW, why didn't we go into social spacing and lockdown back then? A disease with its own special interest group that lead to hundreds of thousands of deaths.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-04-08 07:49  

#4  “In the beginning, those [HIV/AIDS activists] had a blanket disgust with us,” Fauci later admitted to the Washington Post. “And it was mutual. Scientists said all trials should be restricted, rigid and slow. The gay groups said we were killing people with red tape. [Emphasis added]. When the smoke cleared we realized that much of their criticism was absolutely valid.”

Sound familiar?
Posted by: bbrewer126   2020-04-08 01:43  

#3  
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-08 01:22  

#2  The 79-year-old Fauci has served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, having served under six U.S. presidents, beginning with Ronald Reagan.

And where are we today? Government tenured, but entirely ineffective.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-04-08 00:55  

#1  Consistency is a hobgoblin of small minds.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-08 00:49  

00:00