You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Attorney General Barr: Durham's Focused On Indictments, Not A Report
2020-04-10
[Hot Air] Yesterday, we wondered whether Laura Ingraham’s teaser from her interview with Attorney General William Barr might have left out some context. It actually might have undersold Barr’s comments on Operation Crossfire Hurricane and US Attorney John Durham’s probe into the FBI and intelligence agencies. The Fox News host asked Barr when we could expect to see Durham’s report, and Barr replied that he’s not sure there will be a report.

So what will Durham produce? Indictments, apparently:
Barr wouldn’t tell Ingraham how far Durham had advanced in the investigation, but said it was a "sprawling case" that "takes some time" to fully investigate.

"I think a report may be and probably will be a byproduct of his activity but his primary focus isn’t to prepare a report. He is looking to bring to justice people who were engaged in abuses if he can show that they were criminal violations and that’s what the focus is on," Barr told Ingraham. ...

Barr argued that the FBI investigation into Trump’s presidential campaign was riddled with abuse of power and had no evidence to back it up. He did not mention the intelligence that prompted the investigation, including a Trump campaign adviser boasting that he knew Russia had damaging information on then-Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.

"I think the president has every right to be frustrated because I think what happened to him was one of the greatest travesties in American history," Barr said. "Without any basis, they started this investigation of his campaign and even more concerning actually is what happened after the campaign, a whole pattern of events while he was president."
Politico comments that Trump supporters hoped for a report to use in the election, but indictments wouldn’t be a terribly disappointing substitute, I’d guess. They form a narrative as well ‐ as Robert Mueller himself employed in that farcical indictment of Concord Management that blew up in his face when they demanded discovery access. The Department of Justice had to withdraw the indictment last month in order to avoid allowing the Russian-controlled firm access to the intel on which the indictment was based.

That outcome must have alerted John Durham to the dangers of PR-focused indictments. It’s safer just to issue reports, another lesson also learned by Mueller and his special-counsel team. If Durham is focusing on criminal violations and "bring[ing] to justice" those who committed them, that hints that Durham thinks he’s got enough to go all the way to trial ‐ assuming we see any indictments. It’s tough to imagine Barr selling this on national television at this late stage of the probe, though, without knowing what Durham plans and what he has up his sleeve.
Posted by:Besoeker

#5  We'll see.
Posted by: Cesare   2020-04-10 16:05  

#4  ^Courts can still be Kabuki - though less than once, thanks Mitch.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-10 12:47  

#3  While I am hopeful, until we start seeing the players in the coup frog walked into courtrooms this is all kabuki theater.
Posted by: DarthVader   2020-04-10 12:40  

#2   Barr is a a smart guy. Lesser players embedded in the agencies have careers to protect and aren’t betting on Presidential cover next cycle. Talking about indictments and being credible is shaking free stories and insurance documents from the minions below. Late July just before August recess is an excellent time to drop some paper on high profile subjects.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2020-04-10 11:44  

#1  A report is subject to public scrutiny, indictments are 'ongoing investigation' privileged, I think.
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-04-10 10:20  

00:00