You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
George W. Bush Center: More Globalization Is the Answer to Coronavirus Crisis
2020-04-18
Sorry, guys — you missed your moment. In other words: NO.
[Breitbart] Executives with the George W. Bush Presidential Center say more globalization of the American economy is the answer to the Chinese coronavirus crisis, not the problem.

In an op-ed published in Real Clear World, Managing Director of the George W. Bush Institute-SMU Economic Growth Initiative Matthew Rooney writes that the policies of free trade, mass immigration, and globalization must be embraced further by the U.S. after the crisis is over.

Economic nationalism, Rooney writes, must be rejected:

As COVID-19 spreads and stresses healthcare infrastructure around the world, governments and civil society are racing to slow the pandemic by distancing people from one another. Meanwhile, in the United States and in other developed countries, there is a rising chorus of voices who argue that we must deglobalize, dismantle international supply chains, reduce international trade and travel, and close our borders to the world. [Emphasis added]

The danger of a pandemic did not arise because of globalization. Pandemics have appeared periodically throughout history. Deglobalizing will not protect us from pandemics in the future. On the contrary, we will ultimately come to see that global cooperation is key to responding successfully to pandemics. [Emphasis added]

Obviously, in the ongoing crisis, our top priority must be the health and safety of our families, our neighbors, and our national community. We must be prepared to do what it takes to "flatten the curve" of infection, and to spend what it takes to prevent economic collapse. But when the crisis is over, and we have defeated the virus and people are back at work and we are all able to go out for dinner again, we must be ready to come together around a new strategy for globalization that secures its benefits and cures its ills. It will take American leadership and political will, but we know what needs to be done and have successfully met greater challenges in the past. [Emphasis added]

Globalization of the American economy — forged by the Bush presidencies, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama — has had a crippling impact on working- and middle-class Americans for decades and has been exacerbated during the coronavirus crisis.

Since 2001, free trade with China has cost millions of Americans their jobs. For example, the Economic Policy Institute has found that from 2001 to 2015, about 3.4 million U.S. jobs were lost due to the nation’s trade deficit with China.

Of the 3.4 million U.S. jobs lost in that time period, about 2.6 million were lost in the manufacturing industry, making up about three-fourths of the loss of jobs from the U.S.-Chinese trade deficit. Research has revealed that American towns that had their manufacturing bases gutted have been hit hardest with rampant drug addition during the opioid crisis.
Posted by:Besoeker

#22  a new strategy for globalization that secures its benefits and cures its ills."

Tell us more about the "cures its ills" part, Uncle Matthew. Globalization is all about flow. But not just goods, capital and labor. You also get crime, drugs, jihadis and the odd pandemic. People get all giddy over the good stuff - Woo Woo! We're making money! - and pretend the negatives don't exist. So by all means, let's talk about curing those ills.
Posted by: SteveS   2020-04-18 21:44  

#21  Well, since Barbara died, I think Georgie, Laura, the kids, a few cousins and Max Boot and Evan McMuffin still love the Boosh fambly...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-18 18:20  

#20  Ucky blue collar people. They buy guns and go to church. Have kids. Has to be stopped...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-18 18:16  

#19  Of the 3.4 million U.S. jobs lost in that time period, about 2.6 million were lost in the manufacturing industry

Each manufacturing job supports 3-5 other jobs. That's why entire cities and regions were gutted by moving manufacturing to China.
Posted by: Bubba Claing1437   2020-04-18 16:04  

#18  House of Bush = our very own royal-Bourbon family:
"They have learned nothing and forgotten nothing"
Posted by: Lex   2020-04-18 13:54  

#17  Obviously, in the ongoing crisis, our top priority must be the health and safety of our families, our neighbors, and our national community.


Nice throat-clearing.

But when the crisis is over, and we have defeated the virus and people are back at work and we are all able to go out for dinner again, we must be ready to come together around a new strategy for globalization that secures its benefits and cures its ills.

Translation: "Once the emergency has passed, let's go back to doing what caused the problem in the first place.God forbid we'd learn any actual lessons from this."

Followed by more throat-clearing about "a new strategy for globalization that secures its benefits and cures its ills."
Posted by: charger   2020-04-18 13:49  

#16  Enough of the Bushes and the Clintons. Two sides of the same bad penny.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-04-18 13:37  

#15  I also believe the country had had enough of the Bush clan.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-18 13:08  

#14  This is why Jeb got his ass kicked in 2016.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-04-18 13:06  

#13  Indeed. But there's the element of piss-poor planning as well. When everybody is fat and happy, nobody cares. Until....
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-18 11:42  

#12  And, if they can do it cheaper and better, then who cares?

As long as everyone plays nice, it's all groovy! But as soon as someone decides to use their sole supplier status of $SOMETHING_IMPORTANT as leverage, then it sucks to be you.
Posted by: SteveS   2020-04-18 11:40  

#11  Globalism where all production concentrated in one, totalitarian, country?

And who's fault is that? And, if they can do it cheaper and better, then who cares? Some would argue that patents and copyrights are restraints to free trade. Without those, who knows how much cheaper products (to include pharmaceuticals) would be. It's no wonder Big Pharma fights like trapped rats over patent protection and hate generics (like HCQ).

And why does the US treat Cuba so differently if PRC is so totalitarian? (Well, Chinese can travel, there is that.)
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-18 11:18  

#10  Less stuff & better stuff indeed ... stuff built to last, as opposed to the planned-obsolescence Chinese-made crap
Posted by: Lex   2020-04-18 11:04  

#9  Globalism where all production concentrated in one, totalitarian, country?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-18 10:06  

#8  I've got nothing inherently against "globalism" from an economic standpoint. I'm all for the free flow of goods and services. But, we do not have a free market (remember NAFTA and its hundreds and hundreds of pages?), and that is one of the problems.

The US, IMO, has a screwed up tax code a constantly changing one, especially depending on who rules Capitol Hill. I should think it is tough for businesses to make long-range plans when they never know what the next Congress might pull.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-18 10:02  

#7  Globalism has pushed us towards cheaper, disposable, products. The Environmentalists should be pissed about it. But they were never serious anyway.environmentalism was always a scam to sugar-coat communism anyway.
Posted by: ruprecht   2020-04-18 09:56  

#6  And that is just another example of these statists (Bush, Clinton, Obama) being two sides of the same coin. They can GTFOH and ram that UN tax up their respective culos.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-18 09:10  

#5  In Washington, Mr. Rooney was on loan to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to create a high-level private sector advisory body for the Summits of the Americas, working closely with the U.S. private sector and with companies and business associations from throughout the Americas to negotiate an agenda to promote economic integration in the region. Previously, he was Deputy Assistant Secretary responsible for relations with Canada and Mexico and for regional economic policy.
Get the picture?
Posted by: b   2020-04-18 09:06  

#4  And watch the portfolios of those fat cats expand.

I voted for Bush because of the choices but man he has turned into a real asshole on this stuff.
I figure Pope Frank is all on board with this.

What, exactly, is this problem that will be solved by turning most of America into a 3rd world shit-hole while the Bushes, Clintons, Obamas and their rich friends get richer and more powerful?

I expect to hear these scum suckers coming out in favor of the UN income tax any day now.
Posted by: AlanC   2020-04-18 08:42  

#3  Buy less. Buy better stuff. I'm no union fan, but slave labor doesn't tickle me either. Taxes suck but better it is collected and spent here than there.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-18 06:47  

#2  I suppose there are trade-offs. Do Americans want cheaper products or more expensive ones? What's the average Chinese worker make compared to [unionized] workers here? Do regulations serve as an obstacle? Tax code? Lots of questions.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-18 06:38  

#1  Gerbilism is near death. Hopefully urbanism will occupy the next grave over.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-04-18 02:19  

00:00