You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Did Xi Jinping Deliberately Sicken the World?
2020-04-19
[TheDiplomat] We often ascribe a basic level of humanity to even the cruelest leaders, but People's Republic of China leader Xi Jinping's actions have forced us to rethink this assumption.
Although the emergence of the novel coronavirus now known as SARS-CoV-2 was probably not due to China's actions, the emphasis that its authoritarian system places on hiding bad news likely gave the disease a sizable head start infecting the world. But most ominously, China's obsession with image and Machtpolitik raises serious questions about its lack of moral limits.
At some point the Chinese Communist Party learned of the epidemic and made a decision to hide its existence, hoping it went away. Exposés in Hong Kong's South China Morning Post and the Chinese mainland's Caixin show that the information that did flow out of China early in the crisis did so only because of the courage of individual Chinese people in the face of government repression. People in the Wuhan epicenter, however, began to get wise ‐ and scared (here and here) ‐ by the end of December 2019, forcing their government to say something. The authorities gave the impression of a nontransmissible disease already under containment. We know now this was entirely false, likely designed more to ease civil unrest than protect the people.

The mayor of Wuhan even suggested that the central government prevented him from revealing details about the epidemic until January 20. Considering the first public announcements came out of Wuhan on January 1, we can assume that Xi had a sense of the danger prior to that.
Posted by:Clem

#32  "The lack of water has resulted in China having to close down coal mines (coal mining uses a lot of water) and that has impacted on steel production."

Without steel,they can't build ships...and would have to swim to our shores...lol
Posted by: crazyhorse   2020-04-19 23:19  

#31  Chinese are extremely selfish and chauvinistic, both personally and at a civilizational level. Their actions flow from that.
Posted by: Bubba Claing1437   2020-04-19 18:34  

#30   But a China that feels deliberately besieged is going to react as Japan did to the cutting off the sale of oil in 1941, to whit, Pearl Harbor.

Not unless we have a president who is as much of an idiot as Roosevelt. Maybe I shouldn't say that because the memories of Baraq Obama are still fresh.

But we can't go on the way we've been going. If we have to confront them it's better to do it now than to wait until they suck us dry.

Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-04-19 17:46  

#29  Figure out a surreptitious way to blow up / destroy the Three Gorges Dam and call it even.
Posted by: Raj   2020-04-19 17:40  

#28  On the other hand, Xi may (suddenly) die of coronavirus.

Complicated by lead poisoning.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-04-19 17:31  

#27  #26 On the other hand, Xi may (suddenly) die of coronavirus.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-19 17:05  

#26  This one was either deliberate or taking advantage of the situation while still feeling ascendant. But a China that feels deliberately besieged is going to react as Japan did to the cutting off the sale of oil in 1941, to whit, Pearl Harbor.
Posted by: trailing wife   2020-04-19 16:59  

#25  I'm ok with blankets and MRE's sent to the Russians.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-04-19 16:55  

#24  #22 It's historically Chinese territory, just like Tibet and Italy.
Posted by: Matt   2020-04-19 16:54  

#23  The lack of political will is the biggest problem we have. We stayed the course in the Cold War with the USSR from 1945 to 1989. But we can't even get started on a Cold War with China because there are too many powerful people and corporations in our country who have vested interests in business as usual. Once we overcome that problem, the war with China should be easy.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-04-19 16:53  

#22  War with Russia to regain Siberia and specifically Lake Baikal

Regain?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-19 16:51  

#21   I don't know that you ever get a definitive smoking gun.

That's the beauty of it.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2020-04-19 16:41  

#20  Speaking of Russian neighbors, some additional what if's, impacts, and predictions:

China was already starting to unravel due to severe demographic and environmental pressures, especially the lack of sufficient drinking water. 70% of China’s drinking water is polluted. 30% of that is toxic. The Chinese have been moving Han Chinese westward in the tens of millions to water sources in Tibet and Central Asia. The lack of water has resulted in China having to close down coal mines (coal mining uses a lot of water) and that has impacted on steel production.

COVID-19 will turn out to be China’s biological Chernobyl. It has accelerated Communist China’s unraveling.

What is the solution? War with Russia to regain Siberia and specifically Lake Baikal – the largest fresh water in the world (by volume). Baikal holds 40 % of Russia’s fresh water.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-04-19 16:41  

#19  #16 It only took 5 years to defeat the Empire of Japan. Reagan crushed the USSR in 8 years. It just depends on how serious we are prepared to be. To do nothing would be to cede leadership to a disgusting evil clique of monsters. In reality, this is not the worst thing the CCP has ever done. They are that evil. I am old. I won't live long enough to see the end game. But I sure don't want the US to become the CCP's bitch.
Posted by: Albemarle Gray4543   2020-04-19 16:40  

#18  Kick em out of WTO for starters.
Posted by: Lex   2020-04-19 16:31  

#17  They've pissed off every one of their neighbors. We have a containment strategy staring us in the face. We need to cut off their gulf oil access and peel off Russia. Do that, and bring our supply chains home or near-shore.

All it takes is political will.
Posted by: Lex   2020-04-19 16:31  

#16  /\ ....methodically disengage with them, as painful as that may be and as long as that may take.

A couple of hundred years would be a very good start.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-04-19 16:28  

#15  The waters are muddied by the fact that we funded the research into bat viruses with a $3.5 million grant from NIH. That is awkward. But no doubt they concealed and lied and shut down at home while exporting the virus to everyone else. They knew how contagious it was. We need to methodically disengage with them, as painful as that may be and as long as that may take.
Posted by: Albemarle Gray4543   2020-04-19 16:26  

#14  OT - In a similar vain, I see AG Barr put the kabosh on releasing files for those seeking damages from KSA form 9/11.
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-19 16:26  

#13  Cold War.
Contain, curtail, constrict.
Posted by: Lex   2020-04-19 16:23  

#12  The lawyers have now been called:

The Israeli NGO Shurat HaDin means to file a class action lawsuit against China in the upcoming days for its alleged negligence in treating and containing the coronavirus, N12 reported on Sunday.

Also.....

AT LEAST FOUR CLASS-ACTION SUITS FILED AGAINST CHINA, SEEKING TRILLIONS OVER CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK IN U.S.



Posted by: Besoeker   2020-04-19 16:21  

#11  I don't know that you ever get a definitive smoking gun. But it appears increasingly obvious that somebody, some where along the line decided, 'it's gone way too far now, (intentionally or not) may as well make the most of it'.

Precisely.
Posted by: charger   2020-04-19 15:48  

#10  ^Surrender is an option?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-19 15:18  

#9  Not too keen on starting a war anywhere, a war with China would not go well.

Unfortunately, the US and business interests sold their souls to China long ago. We, the US, made our beds....
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-19 15:08  

#8  ^You're going to start a war with China - instead of quietly strangling it?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-19 15:04  

#7  IMO, a bit too much

Ergo, Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were not casus belli?
Posted by: Clem   2020-04-19 15:00  

#6  If so, this is a casus belli of the first order.

IMO, a bit too much
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-19 14:55  

#5  Something sent to me this morning:

The Chinese Communist Party has had a long term goal of world domination. Things were going their way under the previous three presidents as we fecklessly allowed our industrial base to be transferred to China. They were picking our pockets clean. Replacing the US as the dominant world power was the linchpin of this plan. Their strategy was to cripple the US economically which would cascade down to make it impossible for the US to be remain militarily dominant. This was the death of a thousand cuts. What if China were presented the opportunity to deliver a single crippling blow to wreck the American economy as well as that of the rest of the advanced world?

The Chinese delayed telling the world about the seriousness of the virus until they had scoured the world of PPE/medicines. In that time did they conclude that they could ride the virus as an accelerated vehicle for world domination? They had quarantined Wuhan and its province and stopped air travel throughout China while not interrupting international travel. For argument’s sake, let me say that they concluded that by strict domestic measures and the use of the world’s supply of PPE/medicines they could control their domestic outbreak while unleashing the virus on the rest of the world. The virus would spread around the world crippling the world’s economies while China would emerge largely undamaged and internationally ascendant. If so, the Chinese have killed ten times more Americans with this single blow than died on Dec 7, 1941 and Sep 11, 2001 and done more economic damage more precipitously than the Great Depression.

If so, this is a casus belli of the first order.

Gives new meaning to the old term, The Yellow Peril, coined by Kaiser Bill as Das Gelbe Gefahr.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-04-19 14:29  

#4  If not, he couldn't have done it much better.
Posted by: Skidmark   2020-04-19 13:18  

#3  I don't know that you ever get a definitive smoking gun. But it appears increasingly obvious that somebody, some where along the line decided, 'it's gone way too far now, (intentionally or not) may as well make the most of it'.
Posted by: Cesare   2020-04-19 08:09  

#2  Note the dates...

Someone needs to ask the anti-Trump fanatics exactly when he was to take all these preventative measures that they say he didn't take?

Are they telling us that he has super powers that can see the future now?

This whole "incident" has disgusted me on so many levels.
Posted by: AlanC   2020-04-19 07:51  

#1  We know Wuhan was quarantined from the rest of China but open to the World.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-04-19 03:47  

00:00