You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Appeals court says Trump Muslim travel ban cannot be challenged
2020-06-09
[IsraelTimes] A federal appeals court on Monday ordered a lower court to dismiss legal challenges to President Donald Trump
...His ancestors didn't own any slaves...
’s three-year-old ban on travelers from predominantly Moslem countries, finding that a judge misinterpreted a Supreme Court ruling.
Oh dear. That’s not the kind of remark that makes a personnel file shine when promotions are in the offing.
The ban, put in place just a week after Trump took office in January 2017, sparked an international outcry from Moslem advocates and others who said it was rooted in religious bias.

A three-judge panel of the Richmond-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that a federal judge in Maryland made a mistake when he refused to dismiss three lawsuits, after the Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018 in a separate case filed in Hawaii.

"We conclude that the district court misunderstood the import of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hawaii and the legal principles it applied," Judge Paul Niemeyer wrote in the unanimous decision.

The Supreme Court ruling had found that the ban has a "legitimate grounding in national security concerns."

During a hearing in January, Mark Mosier, an attorney representing US citizens and permanent residents whose relatives have been unable to enter the US because of the ban, asked the court to allow the legal challenges to proceed.
Related:
4th US Circuit Court of Appeals : 2019-01-17 US court rejects effort to require stricter Pentagon gun checks
4th US Circuit Court of Appeals : 2003-04-04 Moussaoui trial might move to Military court
Posted by:trailing wife

#3  a federal judge in Maryland made a mistake when he refused to dismiss three lawsuits

A very generous interpretation of his actions. Is he still a judge? Will it affect his pay or responsibilities? Will he have to go back to school to learn his job?
Posted by: gorb   2020-06-09 10:41  

#2  First, Trump *is* the President, which gives him the legal right to do President stuff, no matter whose hair is on fire.
Second, it was *not* a Muslim ban, no matter how many times it gets called that. It was a ban on travelers from specific countries.
Posted by: SteveS   2020-06-09 10:37  

#1  Some black robed tyrants get their wigs set on fire? (yea, I know, I know, but ...)
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-06-09 10:14  

00:00