Submit your comments on this article | |
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather- | |
Pandemic exposes scientific rift over proving when germs are airborne | |
2020-07-12 | |
"Three in one!" "No, one in three!" [PUBLISH.TWITTER]
| |
Posted by:Fred |
#6 China is crossing a virus with a hummingbird as we speak. |
Posted by: Grunter 2020-07-12 17:58 |
#5 It's simple, if it is the globalists' best interest for the germs to be airborne, then they are airborne. |
Posted by: Bob Grorong1136 2020-07-12 15:27 |
#4 ^Touche! |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-07-12 08:49 |
#3 How many certainly would be more efficient, my dear, but century-old assumptions are not willingly reexamined. I don’t recall any being reexamined before Ebola exploded on the scene — do you? |
Posted by: trailing wife 2020-07-12 08:39 |
#2 Measles is airborne, and has an R-naught of 12-18. The R-naught for COVID is 3.28 (in Australia). Wikipedia There seems to be a disconnect. Maybe the science ain't settled. |
Posted by: Bobby 2020-07-12 08:35 |
#1 One does wonder what unfounded assumption the next one will reveal. Not how many, TW? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-07-12 06:44 |