Submit your comments on this article |
Fifth Column |
Denver Police Union Head Confirms ‘Stand-Down’ Order was in Place at Pro-Cop Rally |
2020-07-25 |
[AMGREATNESS] Randy Corporon, a lawyer and one of the rally’s organizers, revealed that the excuse he was given by Denver Police Chief Paul Pazen, prior to the event, was that Pazen feared that “his officers were going to get hurt.” Corporon says he responded by simply saying that “he should allow his officers to do their job…if people are down there breaking the law, stop them.” Remember back in World War II, when Patton refused to let his men assault Anzio Beach because his men might get hurt? And that time Eisenhower thought about taking Normandy? And Zhukov was gonna throw the Nazis out of Stalingrad? |
Posted by:Fred |
#13 Kristallnacht! *Spit* The thugs break windows while the cops are ordered to watch... as long it is the right windows. |
Posted by: magpie 2020-07-25 14:12 |
#12 So the dudes get paid OT for uniform time but not 3x for insurance events? |
Posted by: Skidmark 2020-07-25 13:47 |
#11 Comment #4 g(r)omgoru nails it. New 'superiors' are required. Buy more ammo. |
Posted by: Whiskey Mike 2020-07-25 12:36 |
#10 "also tell them next time they will have their own armed security and will defend themselves against bodily harm with deadly force." They could call themselves Peelers. Rather than the anti-Peel Principles the Denver |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2020-07-25 12:06 |
#9 Paul Pazen Denver's Cressida Dick. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2020-07-25 12:04 |
#8 Deadly force is a can of worms. Why not just have the crowd practice stampeding towards the attackers after some "unknown" person shouts Gun! |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2020-07-25 11:24 |
#7 The people that were attacked, and had all the lawful permits mind you, should sue the city of Denver. And also tell them next time they will have their own armed security and will defend themselves against bodily harm with deadly force. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2020-07-25 10:29 |
#6 #2 oh, like when the German's bombed Pearl Harbor? (Don't stop him, he's on a roll) |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-07-25 08:33 |
#5 It is often pointed out that the police are not able or required to stop crime, but are merely to address crimes committed. If "might get hurt" is the new bar, I suggest "Serve and Protect" be removed from squad cars, uniform patches, badges, letterhead and promotional materials, as it's false advertising. |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2020-07-25 08:09 |
#4 #3 No army will fight if their superiors don't have their back. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-07-25 07:40 |
#3 his officers were going to get hurt. When did cowardice become a requirement for police? |
Posted by: AlanC 2020-07-25 07:37 |
#2 P2k, I think that was Fred's sarcasm |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2020-07-25 07:35 |
#1 Can you say 'conspiracy to violate civil rights' boys and girls. The Donks played this game in the South and elsewhere in the 20's though the '60s in the last century when it came to looking the other way when their muscle, the Klan, ran the local neighborhood. * Patton was not involved in the Italian campaign after the slapping incident in Sicily. He would be sidelined till after Normandy. The Americans found someone else as 'competent' as the British had found for Gallipoli to carry that one out instead. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-07-25 06:39 |