Submit your comments on this article |
Fifth Column |
PDF about major George Soros loss in the Supreme Court. |
2020-08-22 |
Posted by:3dc |
#8 They would fight to SCOTUS just to not take this pledge? Why? |
Posted by: KBK 2020-08-22 21:07 |
#7 First Amendant is about the right to make pro-prostitution; pedophilia, islamist et al, statements. It is not about the right to get taxpayer money if you do them |
Posted by: Phiter Tingle7493 2020-08-22 14:21 |
#6 Good summary at Judicial Watch of SCOTUS ruling. What 2dc said. In order to obtain taxpayer money for AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, organizations must make an anti-prostitution/sex trafficking pledge. A Soros foreign affiliate claims this violates their first amendment rights. SCOTUS rules they have no first amendment rights. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2020-08-22 09:17 |
#5 SCOTUS is no longer a court. It's another legislature, a totally political branch |
Posted by: Blackbeard Gray7817 2020-08-22 07:55 |
#4 What is the one thing that worries the Liberal-Socialist-Democrat (LSD) party more than anything and causing them to go off the deep end? Trump being able to appoint 1 more SCOTUS Justice that follows the US Constitution and not the LSD Political Agenda. |
Posted by: NN2N1 2020-08-22 06:32 |
#3 KAVANAUGH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, ALITO, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a concurring opinion. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. KAGAN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case These assholes vote in total lockstep |
Posted by: Frank G 2020-08-22 06:17 |
#2 if you are nervous about clicking the title it goes here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-177_b97c.pdf |
Posted by: 3dc 2020-08-22 03:06 |
#1 SCOTUS ruled orgs affiliated w Soros’ Open Society lose the protection of 1A & can be treated as international threats as this impacts supporters in the US & abroad. |
Posted by: 3dc 2020-08-22 02:24 |