You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Never Forget: Smoking Gun Intel Memo From 1990s Warned Of 'Frankenstein The CIA Created'
2020-09-12
[ZERO] As Americans pause to remember the tragic events of September 11, 2001 which saw almost 3,000 innocents killed in the worst terror attack in United States history, it might also be worth contemplating the horrific wars and foreign quagmires unleashed during the subsequent 'war on terror'.

Bush's so-called Global War on Terror targeted 'rogue states' like Saddam's Iraq, but also consistently had a focus on uprooting and destroying al-Qaeda and other armed Islamist terror organizations (this led to the falsehood that Baathist Saddam and AQ were in cahoots). But the idea that Washington from the start saw al-Qaeda and its affiliates as some kind of eternal enemy is largely a myth.

Recall that the US covertly supported the Afghan mujahideen and other international jihadists throughout the 1980's Afghan-Soviet War, the very campaign in which hardened al-Qaeda terrorists got their start. In 1999 The Guardian in a rare moment of honest mainstream journalism warned of the Frankenstein the CIA created — among their ranks a terror mastermind named Osama bin Laden.
Posted by:Besoeker

#11  TW, I think you are definitely in the ball park. If I remember correctly from many years ago, there was even some Bulgarian connection.

But ZH sure has posted its fair share of Sputnik and Russia Today articles over the years.

I think he only recently had his Twitter account restored, so he has that "badge of honor".

But to answer your question, I suppose it is just a reminder--in conjunction with 9/11--about unintended consequences by our government, be it the mujahideen or 1953 Iran.
Posted by: Clem   2020-09-12 12:20  

#10  Doesn’t Zero Hedge have a Russia connection of some sort? What are they trying to accomplish by writing about this now? Stipulating that the CIA has gotten far too many things wrong over the past few generations, is there anything new in this piece?
Posted by: trailing wife   2020-09-12 11:06  

#9  /\ Yes, "around the edges." An excellent term of reference. The term might fit the ill-fated activities of Leon Hasenfus.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-09-12 09:12  

#8  I imagine you are referring to the billions supplied the Arab-Afghans by Saudi Arabia, and the matching funds supplied by the USA in support of military operations. Recall, USA military support was taken charge of by Pakistani ISI once it arrived in Karachi port, or the various airfields of Pakistan. The CIA worked around the edges, (in one unknown case collecting mules for shipment to Pakistan to move arms cross-border to the Muj, etc.). Finally, USA involvement turned the tide when it was decided to send Stingers rather than mules to Muj actives. So, yes, the US military didn't pull the trigger but it certainly was involved in myriad ways in the War for Afghanistan.
Posted by: b   2020-09-12 09:06  

#7  Clowns in America sure called that Berlin Wall falling, didn't they? /sarc
Posted by: Clem   2020-09-12 09:06  

#6  /\ CIA omniscience is a myth.

"Omniscience" as in all knowing, yes I agree. I suspect you may concur, not having an employee in the battle space does not constitute non-involvement.

Posted by: Besoeker   2020-09-12 08:57  

#5  The Al Qaeda was formed at Khost, Afghanistan, in August 1988. There were more than 45 present, and, no, no CIA agent was there. Nor was there CIA funding. Nor did the CIA really find what it was all about until a cache of papers was discovered in Bosnia more than a decade later. Truth be told, CIA omniscience is a myth.
Posted by: b   2020-09-12 08:49  

#4  Yeah and we supported Stalin in the '40s too.

The problem with these analyses is that they don't take the USSR and the cold war into account.

The picture was just too damn big for anyone to take in. When you have that many players in the game all you wind up with is Calvin Ball with guns.
Posted by: AlanC   2020-09-12 07:16  

#3  Ah Gezz Not This Crap Again!
Posted by: Sonny Black   2020-09-12 06:56  

#2  Almost seems like a bet against anyone the Klingons back is a good bet...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-09-12 04:25  

#1  The 'Frankestein' farm; Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadeq, Fidel Castro, Guzman, Diem, Noriega, Muammar Gaddafi, the list goes on.

It was obviously a short journey from attempting to shape foreign policy and politics to shaping domestic policy and politics. Not a great deal of re-tooling necessary.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-09-12 03:21  

00:00