| Submit your comments on this article |
| -PC Follies |
| Gov. Newsom signs bill allowing male inmates who identify as 'women' to be housed in women's prisons in California |
| 2020-09-27 |
| [PostMillennial] California's Governor Gavin Newsom signed a bill Saturday to end sex-segregated prisons in that state, to allow inmates to be housed based on the gender with which they identify as opposed to dividing them by sex. The caveat of the bill is that this privilege is only for those inmates with which the penal system does not have "management or security concerns." This collection of bills, designed with the aim of "strengthening protections for LGBTQ+ Californians," does little for women or children, as it opens female prisons to male-bodied persons, and enables tax payer funds to go toward the medical transitioning of minors. There is also funding to find the impact of COVID-19, which is an illness that primarily affects the elderly and those with existing health complications, on the LGBT+ community. SB 132, sponsored again by San Francisco's own Senator Wiener, will allow inmates to self-select whether they wish to be housed in a men's or women's prison, based on self-ID alone. It will give people the option to house "people according to their own sense of where they will be safest." Moreover, it will make sure that inmates are addressed according to their preferred pronouns throughout their stay in California's prison system. Weiner's primary concern in bringing the legislation was for male-bodied trans persons who would prefer to be housed in women's facilities, with women. Weiner thanked Newson, saying that SB 132 will protect "particularly trans women who are subject to high levels of assault and harassment in men's facilities." Related: Gavin Newsom: 2020-09-24 California's Gavin Newsom Bans Gas-powered Vehicles, Effective 2035 Gavin Newsom: 2020-09-17 State That Just Voted To Reduce Penalties For Pedophiles Not Sure Why God Keeps Lighting Them On Fire Gavin Newsom: 2020-09-14 Gov. Gavin Newsom Signs Bill Reducing Penalties for Sodomy with Minors |
| Posted by:Uloter Ebbomolet9368 |
| #9 ^You're dealing with somebody really unsecure, substantive Robert. So, don't be surprised if |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-09-27 13:16 |
| #8 You should take your own advice. Putz. |
| Posted by: Fat Bob Javish1936 2020-09-27 13:12 |
| #7 You've been here long enough that you should know that. And you missed a good opportunity to shut the fuck up. You've got some nerve lecturing me. |
| Posted by: Raj 2020-09-27 11:30 |
| #6 A huge uptick of prison pregnancies in the future. More costs for the taxpayers. |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2020-09-27 10:47 |
| #5 Dangerous, yes. Stupid, no. This is all part of breaking down the existing social construct before replacing it with communism. You've been here long enough that you should know that. |
| Posted by: Fat Bob Javish1936 2020-09-27 09:36 |
| #4 Weiner thanked Newson, saying that SB 132 will protect "particularly trans women who are subject to high levels of assault and harassment in men's facilities." I'd give it an hour before the 'trans women' turn right around and subject actual women to high levels of assault and harassment. These people (Newsom, etc.) are frightfully stupid and dangerous. |
| Posted by: Raj 2020-09-27 09:27 |
| #3 A lot less female lawbreaking? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-09-27 09:23 |
| #2 Well... at least the pr0n industry can finally get some new plots. |
| Posted by: Mercutio 2020-09-27 09:20 |
| #1 As bizarre as softening[sic] pedophile crime. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2020-09-27 09:11 |