Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Drudge Report - Biden has 91% chance of winning |
2020-10-13 |
That, along with a host of other Anti-Orange Man articles. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#28 I think Drudge sold out and part of the deal was silence about the deal. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2020-10-13 20:51 |
#27 Drudge went TDS a while back. Did Trump is in Mattt's wheaties? |
Posted by: Theager Borgia1057 2020-10-13 19:08 |
#26 Drudge (and Bill O'Reilly) remind me of an old boss I had in their Rise and Downfall: A hard-working Micro-manager that gets older and starts delegating things to their staff -- Revealing that they are terrible Managers. |
Posted by: magpie 2020-10-13 18:36 |
#25 Drudge is like Disney. Neither reflect their creators. Just that Disney has deeper pockets to burn through with fiduciary responsibility thrown to the winds. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-10-13 17:08 |
#24 Liberals are exaggerating their lead so folks down feel hopeless. Ah, don't forget "How could we have lost?! Republican stolen election coup! Fire up the fire bugs!" |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2020-10-13 17:04 |
#23 TW. It is a personal opinion. Now I graduated in statitics and while I forgot most of the maths I still have the thinking habits. Like using indicators. Or considering structure effects (the part about Republicans in houses and Democrats in appartments that is why I compared Biden and Clinton). I would need more indicators and a larger sample of people to be totally sure but I am sceptical about a Biden's victory without ballot stuffing |
Posted by: JFM 2020-10-13 14:42 |
#22 T.W. I wondered what happened to the Drudge site. At some point the change in the site became very noticeable. It tended to be left of center but then it went pretty far left of center. In addition it had an anti-Trump aspect to it. Biden 91% chance of winning? A load of B.S. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2020-10-13 13:54 |
#21 Liberals are exaggerating their lead so folks down feel hopeless. Conservatives are mostly going along lest overconfidence leads to low turnout and loss. We are getting near the point when the polling folks start to slowly drift closer to reality to avoid looking like total fools and not worth paying in future elections. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2020-10-13 13:47 |
#20 Repeated from the other thread: JFM, for the opinion piece you submitted, Statistics and the US elections, did you forget the link or is it your personal opinion? Both are welcome, as it is well-argued, but if you got it somewhere else we need a link. Merci beaucoup! |
Posted by: trailing wife 2020-10-13 13:38 |
#19 So Drudge is so f'ed up now that he totally "forgot" what happened four years ago. Matt Drudge sold the site some time ago, about when the change in focus became noticeable. It’s apparently been run by unsupervised interns ever since. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2020-10-13 13:36 |
#18 So Drudge is so f'ed up now that he totally "forgot" what happened four years ago. But going up against the MSM, Farcebook, Twitter, YouTube, Hollywood, etc., it ain't easy (but evidently they didn't learn their lesson from four years ago, either, isn't that right, "Madame President"? |
Posted by: Clem 2020-10-13 13:24 |
#17 Kamala is Corbyn in drag... And looking at Biden he might not even make it to inauguration... Will Americans elect the Willie Brown sucker as president? |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2020-10-13 13:19 |
#16 If Biden is going to win then why is the attendance to his meetings so low? Why so few "Biden" signs in front of homes? He is doing far worse than Trump and far worse than Clinton did in 2016 |
Posted by: JFM 2020-10-13 13:04 |
#15 110% Chance with all of those Magic Mail-In Ballotsâ„¢. |
Posted by: magpie 2020-10-13 13:02 |
#14 @Matt2030 Clinton had 92% chances |
Posted by: JFM 2020-10-13 13:02 |
#13 Clinton Has 90% Chance of Winning |
Posted by: Matt 2020-10-13 12:14 |
#12 just setting up so they can say trump cheated. Just setting up so they can cheat. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-10-13 12:08 |
#11 just setting up so they can say trump cheated. I can't wait until journalist start getting strung up. |
Posted by: Chris 2020-10-13 11:59 |
#10 About a week ago, O'Reilly was interviewed on News Max and he also said Biden is likely to take the election. I don't believe it. IMO, we are in for a repeat of 2016 but even with a larger margin. There is no enthusiasm for Biden. A handful of people show up at Biden rallies if anyone shows at all. Compare that with Trump rallies. They are huge even in this COVID-19 environment. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2020-10-13 10:03 |
#9 Or the more dangerous than covid option of driving to the voting station. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2020-10-13 09:08 |
#8 So, no need to risk covid by going to a voting station? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2020-10-13 08:47 |
#7 with no worries of being reported as liars. Reported? No. Believed to be liars by the general population? Absolutely. Their only hope is to create enough noise that it will depress Republican turnout. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2020-10-13 08:27 |
#6 Ref #5: Pravda is laying it on thick with no worries of being reported as liars. Not much of a concern with our MSM either. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2020-10-13 08:18 |
#5 Out of the 10 most recent polls used, 9 were "likely voters", 7 were online. Prior to August 15th polls were mostly registered voters. An obvious switch of data points stacking the results. DNC Pravda is laying it on thick with no worries of being reported as liars. |
Posted by: Woodrow 2020-10-13 08:11 |
#4 and he'll do a great job taking over from President Hillary! |
Posted by: Bob Grorong1136 2020-10-13 08:08 |
#3 I had Bee. Also, Drudge Report is still around? |
Posted by: SteveS 2020-10-13 07:58 |
#2 Who is Drudge? |
Posted by: Mad Eye Angonter1301 2020-10-13 07:32 |
#1 Is that the percentage chance of his senatorial campaign? |
Posted by: airandee 2020-10-13 06:44 |