Submit your comments on this article |
-PC Follies |
Rugby findings on athlete biology set to shake up international sports |
2020-10-29 |
[TheHill] Earlier this year, World Rugby caused somewhat of a stir when its draft proposals to ban biological men from playing at the top level of women’s rugby were reported by The Guardian. The proposals were of particular interest because they were in sharp contrast to the rules of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which has loosened its requirements to focus on athletes’ testosterone levels. World Rugby was also the first international sporting federation to indicate such a move, which led to immediate criticism from some quarters that the proposals were "harmful" despite the fact the they were aimed at safeguarding players’ health. Earlier this month, World Rugby released the final version of its Transgender Guidelines document, confirming that biological men would be barred from playing at the top level of women’s rugby. The reasoning was based on two primary factors that had emerged from the scientific research into the issue: first, the unacceptable risk of injury to female players; and second, the existence of significant performance advantages. Rugby is a full-contact sport that involves frequent collisions, and there are particular risks to players’ heads and necks. The nature of the sport means that injuries are frequent and, very sadly, they occasionally result in life-altering disabilities. With that in mind, the conclusion reached by World Rugby should not be entirely surprising. However, the pioneering research that underpinned the final decision was compelling and is likely to send shockwaves throughout the sporting world. |
Posted by:Beavis |
#15 Ted, I mean Olga isn't going to like this... |
Posted by: Slappy 2020-10-29 20:37 |
#13 Eleanor Rugby, anyone? |
Posted by: Gerthudion Lover of the Heathen Rus4773 2020-10-29 18:58 |
#12 If someone had testicles as a teenager, then they are a male as far as sports go, forever. |
Posted by: KBK 2020-10-29 17:57 |
#11 http://www.johncandy.com/VideoDetail.aspx?VideoID=41&VideoSection=7 |
Posted by: 746 2020-10-29 16:41 |
#10 7' tall woman - can't dunk. 6'2" man - 180 behind back dunk. Last woman's world cup, after a game the Let's Get USA Interested In Meterball! promoters had a highlight reel of Euro League. It was like watching the games were in fast forward, nevermind the trickiness and agility pushing an attack down the center then blasting a shot from the box corner. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2020-10-29 13:10 |
#9 Doesn't shock the sports world. In fact, for the pros those numbers are on the conservative side. It does shock the socialites and those who would cater to them. Need to knock this off before someone gets hurt. There was a story out from a gal in MMA who fought a dude with shaved legs, said it was the hardest she had ever been punched before and dude looked like he was on the weaker end of the weight class. Then there is the classic Australian Dude in Ponytail takes on entire Asian Handball Circuit. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2020-10-29 13:06 |
#8 Dixie Chicks, meet Chicks Wit Dicks |
Posted by: Herb Pholuck3554 2020-10-29 11:41 |
#7 AlanC it’s usually cauliflower ear |
Posted by: Beavis 2020-10-29 11:04 |
#6 I remember a bumper sticker from years ago: "Give blood - play rugby" |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2020-10-29 10:51 |
#5 When will we see "transgender" men playing in women's basketball? |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2020-10-29 09:24 |
#4 From what I've seen of Rugby one requirement is having an ear ripped off. You girls down with that? |
Posted by: AlanC 2020-10-29 08:53 |
#3 #1 Interesting link. I especially enjoyed the woke conviction that the system is 'rigged against them', or what most people think of as physical reality. |
Posted by: Cesare 2020-10-29 08:09 |
#2 Cervix vs Prostate leagues issue solved |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2020-10-29 07:17 |
#1 They'd rather let women be hurt by men breaking their bones than give one inch on their "woke" policies. Let that sink in. It's a fundamental rejection of reality. They don't think that there is one reality independent of any observer. They really think like this. See: https://newdiscourses.com/2020/07/woke-wont-debate-you-heres-why/ |
Posted by: Jaiger Sleath7993 2020-10-29 01:54 |