You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Republicans Slam Trump’s Plan to Reduce Troops in Afghanistan
2020-11-18
[ToloNews] US Congressional Republicans on Monday slammed President Donald Trump
...dictatorial for repealing some (but not all) of the diktats of his predecessor, misogynistic because he likes pretty girls, homophobic because he doesn't think gender bending should be mandatory, truly a man for all seasons......
’s plan for a swift reduction of US forces in Afghanistan, warning that it would be a gift to America’s enemies.

"A rapid withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan now would hurt our allies and delight the people who wish us harm," US Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said.

US media reported on Tuesday that President Donald Trump is pushing to accelerate the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan.

"We’re playing a limited, limited but important role in defending American national security and American interests against terrorists," said Mitch McConnell.

"That’s why last year, 70 senators, a bipartisan super majority voted for an amendment I authored, it acknowledged the progress made in Syria and Afghanistan, identified the risks that remain, and cautioned that precipitous withdrawal would create vacuums that Iran, Russia and the bully boyz would be delighted, delighted to fill," McConnell said.

He said violence affecting Afghans is still rampant, the "Taliban
...Arabic for students...
is not abiding by the conditions of the so-called peace deal."

"The consequences of a premature American exit would likely be even worse than President Obama’s withdrawal from Iraq back in 2011," McConnell said.

The US Senate majority leader said that a premature withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan would "embolden the Taliban, especially the deadly Haqqani wing, and risk plunging Afghan women and girls back into what they experienced, back in the 1990s."

Under a draft order circulating at the Pentagon on Monday, the number of US forces in Afghanistan would be halved from the current deployment of 4,500 troops, The New York Times

...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...

reported, quoting US officials.

McConnell said the US troops withdrawal from Afghanistan would be welcome news to Iran, "which has long provided arms and support to the Taliban and explicitly seeks our retreat from the Middle East."

"A disorganized retreat would jeopardize the track record of major successes this administration has worked hard to compile," McConnell said.

This comes as Defense Ministry on Monday said that the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces are capable to defend the country if there is a withdrawal of international forces from the country. But Afghan experts have said the withdrawal should be done responsibly.

Countries in the region, including Pakistain, Iran
...a theocratic Shiite state divided among the Medes, the Persians, and the (Arab) Elamites. Formerly a fairly civilized nation ruled by a Shah, it became a victim of Islamic revolution in 1979. The nation is today noted for spontaneously taking over other countries' embassies, maintaining whorehouses run by clergymen, involvement in international drug trafficking, and financing sock puppet militias to extend the regime's influence. The word Iran is a cognate form of Aryan. The abbreviation IRGC is the same idea as Stürmabteilung (or SA). The term Supreme Guide is a the modern version form of either Duce or Führer or maybe both. They hate Jews Zionists Jews. Their economy is based on the production of oil and vitriol...
and Russia have also asked for a responsible withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan.

The reports come as violence has significantly increased in the country despite peace efforts. Meanwhile,
...back at the shootout, Butch clutched at his other shoulder......
the peace negotiations in Doha have stalled over differences on ground rules for the talks.
Khaama Press adds:
NATO has under 12,000 troops in Afghanistan, of which more than half are non-US forces. “Even with further US [forces] reductions, NATO will continue its mission to train, advise and assist the Afghan security forces,” said NATO in a statement Tuesday
Posted by:trailing wife

#16  phuquein Ay, you said (once again), bring em home , keep em safe, let fight on the home front or in our hemisphere if they must. defense contractors can go get Phuqued, their evil, we have one here.... Northrup Grummond, little guy, looks like Dr. Evil's # 2. He owns Aspen of all places...just sayin'
Posted by: 746   2020-11-18 23:13  

#15   Send hundreds of 000s of our troops to battle non-existent threats abroad

What utter and total nonsense. Yes, the threat embedded itself here at home decades ago, when the Muslim Brotherhood first arrived and settled. CAIR, ISNA, the Holy Land Foundation, agents of Iran’s Mad Mullahs... we all here know the list. But the threat came from out there, continues to be very active out there, and connects with the embedded threat here at home whenever possible. Somali lads and Al Shabaab, Yemeni lads and Al Qaeda in Arabia, everywhere else lads and ISIS, Lebanese/Iranians and Hezbollah, Palestinians and Hamas, Pakistanis and pretty much everyone — they connect by family, by phone and internet. So we cannot fix the problems here at home without doing something about the problem out there.

For twenty years we’ve been out there, killing tens of thousands of bad guys connected to the bad guys here at home, tracing the connections, learning which tribes and clans and families make up the various organizations and how the organizations interconnect with each other. We may be withdrawing the troops, but we won’t be able to turn our back on the world completely. It’ll just be spies and Special Forces raids, and lots of people spending long hours monitoring the internet and interpreting satellite photos instead.
Posted by: trailing wife   2020-11-18 22:38  

#14  Somewhere in the dusty archives at Foggy Bottom is the file marked Monroe Doctrine. Consider that for a while and recognise we are broke and broken domestically and need to step back from being the “superpower” piñata.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2020-11-18 13:13  

#13  The point of the endless war without victory in Afghanistan is to keep troops there. It's an outpost in a global empire. The Taliban - pah! A sideshow. US troops are near Pakistan's nuclear weapons and can invade if necessary. CIA can recruit Uighurs to cause trouble for China. And Afghanistan is near China's belt & road project, which US forces can invade and sever if necessary.

It's hugely expensive being a global empire, but the US government less Trump is totally in favor of it. Their sons won't die in these wars, so why do they care? It's not their money, either.
Posted by: Jaiger Sleath7993   2020-11-18 11:14  

#12  /\ Said in memory of Gary, Randy and Tim (Giz) some SF friends, that I worked with, that died Oct. 3 & 4th 1993.
Posted by: NN2N1


Yes, Mogadishu, such a better place today. Unless they attack Ormond Beach, Stay the fok out of Africa and the ME. They need no assistance in slaughtering themselves. Send in a small reconnaissance & surveillance team in 250 years or so to check progress.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-11-18 09:11  

#11  Defend CONUS
Develop / enhance Prompt Global Strike
Continue improving Ballistic Missile Defense
Pledge to evaluate / sunset defense treaties
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-11-18 09:11  

#10  

Not just the Republicans.
The Socialists-Democrats also have deep Military Industrial complex ties and make $$ millions in income from our semi-wars also.

Why do we keep maiming and killing our US Soldiers using them as the Worlds Peace keeping Police?
When the Immigrants from those countries, we were protecting then come to the USA to set up a mini-version of their Old FAILED culture and situation?
Then bring the Threat here... and even run and hold Federal level political offices.

My position is simple.
If it is not an attack on America, and a declared war, with the clear goal of eliminating the Enemy.
Then with what we pay the UN each year, let them vote to use UN Peace Keepers to handle it or not.

Said in memory of Gary, Randy and Tim (Giz) some SF friends, that I worked with, that died Oct. 3 & 4th 1993.
Posted by: NN2N1   2020-11-18 08:49  

#9  Blue (American) cities cops resign in droves. USA withdraws from it's role of "International Policeman". I wonder if there's a connection?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2020-11-18 07:36  

#8  I haven't seen a single poll on what the US public's current appetite for these involvements is.

Gee, I wonder why...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2020-11-18 07:18  

#7  Mixed feelings. One huge concern of course are the fundamentalist mooslims there. The Afghans I met there in 1988 dismissed them, found them annoying at best.

But second is China moving in for the rare minerals. Monies for which would go to funding ChiComs and islamic jihad.

Come to think about it, don't like this.
Posted by: Woodrow   2020-11-18 07:18  

#6  Send hundreds of 000s of our troops to battle non-existent threats abroad while refusing to allow the Guard to suppress a violent insurrection at home. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense
Posted by: Snatch Schwarzeneggar6173   2020-11-18 06:47  

#5  "We’re playing a limited, limited but important role in defending American national security and American interests against terrorists,"

ah, Charlie is already in the wire - Portland, Seattle, et al
Posted by: Procopius2k   2020-11-18 06:39  

#4  "We’re playing a limited, limited but important role in defending American national security and American interests against terrorists,"

Have another mint julep, Mitch. This blather is as bad as the Dem "Russian collusion" claptrap, only much older and moldy.
Posted by: Clem   2020-11-18 06:18  

#3  'Endless Wars' appears to have a republican following.
Posted by: Besoeker   2020-11-18 05:03  

#2  Quick show of hands: how many of you would send your own son or grandson to fight and die in that heroin-seller's 7th century shithole?

For the one or two who raised your hands: To what end? Can you state that end - any goal or objective - with any clarity or coherence?

Can you justify spending another trillion and another two decades there (as opposed to pounding the sh#t out of them from offshore whenever they need & deserve to be pounded)?
Posted by: Thrique Wittlesbach5573   2020-11-18 00:44  

#1  This should be the epitaph of the GOP. Old? Without a doubt, but Grand no longer.
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2020-11-18 00:39  

00:00