Submit your comments on this article |
-Land of the Free |
US government ordered to reinstate protections for 'Dreamers' |
2020-12-05 |
[Jpost] DACA protects 'dreamers,' im In a rebuke to President Donald Trump ...The man who was so stupid he beat fourteen professional politicians, a former tech CEO, and a brain surgeon for the Republican nomination in 2016, then beat The Smartest Woman in the Worldin the general election... 's administration, a judge on Friday ordered the US government to reopen to first-time applicants a program that protects from deportation and grants work permits to hundreds of thousands of 'dreamers,' im The action by US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis in Brooklyn ... New York is in the Second Circuit -- Sonia Sotomayor’s beat. So the White House will have to decide if it is worth fighting at this stage of the proceedings... centered on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program created by Trump's Democratic predecessor Barack ObamaMy friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it... in 2012. The Supreme Court in June blocked Trump's 2017 bid to end DACA. His administration, however, continued its policy of not accepting new applications for the program. Democratic President-elect Joe Foreign Policy Whiz KidBiden ![]() I had the great honor of being arrested with our UN Ambassador on the streets of Soweto, trying to get to see him on Robbens Island... , who takes office on Jan. 20, has said he plans to revitalize DACA. Garaufis directed the Department of Homeland Security to post a public notice "displayed prominently" on its websites by Monday announcing that it is accepting new DACA applications. The judge also ordered that the notice make clear that employment authorization under DACA would last for two years rather than one. The Supreme Court decided that the administration's attempt to end DACA was "arbitrary and capricious" and violated federal law. Following the ruling, acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf in July issued a memo that continued to block new applications to the program while he subjected it to a "full reconsideration." The memo also limited employment authorization to one year and curtailed recipients' ability to travel outside the United States. Garaufis found in November that Wolf had been unlawfully appointed to his post, meaning he did not have the authority to issue the July DACA memorandum. DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump's administration had argued that Obama exceeded his constitutional powers when he created DACA by executive action, bypassing Congress. Obama created DACA after Congress failed to pass bipartisan legislation to overhaul US immigration policy. DACA recipients often are called "Dreamers" based on the name of legislation considered but never passed in Congress. Related: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals: 2020-08-03 Fourth Officer Dies After Crash Allegedly Caused by DACA Illegal Alien Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals: 2019-11-21 More Than 100,000 DACA Applicants Have Been Arrested‐Murder, Rape, DUI Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals: 2019-11-17 Nearly 80,000 immigrants approved for DACA have arrest records, USCIS report finds Related: Nicholas Garaufis: 2017-06-02 ISIS-loving Air Force vet gets 35 years at weepy sentencing Nicholas Garaufis: 2017-05-12 Long Island Terrorist Who Joined Al Qaeda in 2007 Will Be Released This Summer Nicholas Garaufis: 2011-09-27 MOH Recipient Dakota Meyer Wants to Join FDNY Liberal Judge Says No |
Posted by:trailing wife |
#5 Garaufis found in November that Wolf had been unlawfully appointed to his post, meaning he did not have the authority to issue the July DACA memorandum. LOL. What other nation would legalize criminal entry by foreigners with such a bullshit court decision as this? Banana republic time in the USA |
Posted by: Black Bart Scourge of the Swedes1567 2020-12-05 09:45 |
#4 These "judges for life" gotta go. But who is letting them get away with legislating from the bench? |
Posted by: Clem 2020-12-05 09:01 |
#3 Its an executive order canceling another, illegal, executive order. Where does the judge have standing? And since when do judges dictate policy? |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2020-12-05 08:58 |
#2 Another attack on the American people. |
Posted by: Blackbeard Barnsmell6454 2020-12-05 07:45 |
#1 So a judge blocks the un-doing of an executive action overriding the expressed will of Congress? And SCOTUS did essentially the same thing three years ago? I suppose the official rationale is, "We're a nation of immigrants". |
Posted by: Bobby 2020-12-05 07:38 |