You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Kenyan writer Patrick Gathara: No, America should not ‘accept and move on'
2021-02-02
[Aljazeera] "Accept and move on" is a phrase that rears its head every time Kenya has elections. It is an ugly, dismissive phrase that tells people that regardless of the problems they may have with the officially declared outcome of an election, they should just suck it up and carry on. For a country that has always been deathly afraid of elections and the chaos and violence they bring, the legitimacy of polls has always played second fiddle to the impetus to maintain the peace and not rock the boat too much.

Today, I’m hearing something disturbingly similar coming from the US media in its insistence that the conduct of the election must not be queried. Those who raise issue with the conduct of the poll, even when they are politicians who opted to certify the result, are easily accused of fanning the "Big Lie" about electoral fraud that led to violence. It is all too reminiscent of how Kenyan media shut down dissent in the aftermath of the last two elections.

Of course, there are crucial differences. Where in Kenya, it was the opposition claiming fraud by the government in favour of one candidate, in the US it was the incumbent president making claims that were refuted even by his own officials. His claims of rigging have been thrown out of dozens of courts, undermining their credibility, while in Kenya’s case, only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear a dispute over the presidential election.

Yet two similarities stand out: the fact that millions of people believe the election was stolen, and that this presents an escalating probability of violence. This is not how election systems are supposed to work. The goal should be to deliver not just truth, that is they should be free and fair, but also legitimacy, that is they should leave people, especially those on the losing side, convinced that they were free and fair. When a significant portion of the electorate is convinced elections have been stolen, however kooky one may think that belief is, then to that extent, the system has failed and there should be a serious effort undertaken to address the failure.
Posted by:Besoeker

#2  Elections, like Caesar's wife, cannot even give the appearance of impropriety. Anyone who denies the US election of 2020 did at lease give some appearance of irregularities is only fanning the flames of suspicion.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2021-02-02 14:17  

#1  What major nations outside of our dear Kakistan allow mail-in ballots on a mass scale?

Have vote tabulation machines connected to the internet and programmed to allow subtraction of vote tallies and floating-point values?

Have a history of flagrantly, comically corrupt big city political machines in which electoral judges take bribes (cf South Philadelphia elections judge, now in federal prison) and 40% of the precincts are so shambolic that their votes are thrown out (cf Wayne County/Detroit MI, responding to not Trump but Hillary's challenge post-Nov 2016)?

Canada has only paper ballots. France got rid of absentee ballots half a century ago.

We are the laughing stock of the advanced civilized world. And now with a Soviet-style presidium, Soviet elections, and our very own version of Leonid Brezhnev shitting all over the throne.
Posted by: Chomoting Cholutch4272   2021-02-02 13:26  

00:00