/\ My suspicion is that the project is a subsidy/investment mining project, not an energy producing projectWe've certainly never seen that before. Probably another one of those conspiracy theories.
| Submit your comments on this article |
| Science & Technology |
| Consequences of Large-scale Solar and Wind Turbine Farms |
| 2021-02-23 |
| [Blaze Media] A new study finds there could be unintended consequences of constructing massive solar farms in deserts around the world. The eye-opening research claims that huge solar farms, such as in the Sahara, could usher in environmental crises, including altering the climate and causing global warming. How do you get the power thus generated to the users? Batteries delivered by Amazon? The study was carried out by Zhengyao Lu, a researcher in Physical Geography at Lund University, and Benjamin Smith, director of research at the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment at Western Sydney University. The results of their research were published in a Feb. 11 article in The Conversation. Solar panels are darker colors such as black and blue to attract and absorb more heat, but they are usually much darker than the ground around the solar panel. The post cites an article that claims most solar panels are between 15% and 20% efficient in converting sunlight into usable energy. The researchers assert that the rest of the sunlight is returned to the surrounding environment as heat, "affecting the climate." Authors of a 2018 study say that climate models show that installing ample numbers of wind turbines would double precipitation in the Sahara desert, and solar panels would increase precipitation by 50%. The researchers came to this conclusion by determining that the solar panels and wind turbines would decrease the albedo on the land surface. Albedo is the fraction of light that is reflected by a body or surface. The authors conclude their article by stating renewable energy solutions "may help society transition from fossil energy, but Earth system studies like ours underscore the importance of considering the numerous coupled responses of the atmosphere, oceans and land surface when examining their benefits and risks." The Science is settled. And besides, it's rayciss. |
| Posted by:Bobby |
| #5 /\ My suspicion is that the project is a subsidy/investment mining project, not an energy producing project We've certainly never seen that before. Probably another one of those conspiracy theories. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2021-02-23 11:51 |
| #4 Skid, that solar farm is going in about 8 miles from my house; they cut the transmission line through my next door neighbors property but surveyed/located incorrectly and did not have rights or easement for it. My suspicion is that the project is a subsidy/investment mining project, not an energy producing project, and they really don't care if it succeeds or fails. (Think 'The Producers.') |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2021-02-23 11:42 |
| #3 Texas will host the largest solar project in the US More heat?! |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2021-02-23 09:54 |
| #2 Actually the Sahara is probably a good place to put solar and wind power as it won't bother the people living in the big cities near the Mediterranean. If they get more rain out of it, so what. |
| Posted by: Lord Garth 2021-02-23 08:18 |
| #1 Lots of dead birds? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2021-02-23 04:36 |