You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
VDH - Is the Biden Administration Stumbling Into War?
2021-03-01
[American Greatness] What causes wars?

Innately aggressive cultures and governments, megalomania, the desire for power, resources, and empire prompt nations to bully or attack others. Less rational Thucydidean motives such as fear and honor and perceptions of self-interest are not to be discounted either.

But what allows these preemptive or aggressive agendas to reify, to take shape, and to leave tens of thousands dead?

The less culpable target (and wars are rarely a matter of 50/50 culpability) also has a say in what causes wars. The invaded and assaulted sometimes overlooked or contextualized serial and mounting aggression. They displayed real military weakness or simple political ineptness that eroded deterrence. They failed to make defensive alliances with stronger nations or slashed defense investments that made the use of deterrent force impossible.

In sum, without deterrence and the clear potential in extremis to do an aggressor damage, there can be no meaningful peace negotiations, no "conflict resolution"—unless one believes a Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Kim Il-sung can become a reasonable interlocutor across the peace table.

WEAKNESS AS STRENGTH, STRENGTH AS WEAKNESS
But there are also other more subtle follies that can turn tensions into outright fighting. And they are relevant in the current global landscape as we go not just from one president to the next, but from a realist and tragic view of foreign policy to an idealist and therapeutic one.

One catalyst for war is a lack of transparency about the relative strengths and will of potential enemies.

If, even unwittingly, President Biden projects the image that the Pentagon is more concerned about ferreting out wayward internal enemies than in seeking unity by deterring aggressors, then belligerents such as China, North Korea, and Iran and others will likely—even if falsely and unwisely—wager that the United States will not or cannot react to provocations, as it has done in the past. And accordingly, they will be emboldened to provoke their neighbors with less worry about consequences.

Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 on the false assumption that Stalin had been too busy purging his military elite, starving his own people, or executing both rivals and friends. He certainly did all that and more.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  @ #6 - Gotcha. Of course, I did think about Reagan's incursion into Grenada, not exactly like Clinton's bombing of the milk factory, but the reasoning was similar.

Wag the Dog
Posted by: Clem   2021-03-01 23:13  

#7  Stumbling? No. Running headline with eyes wide open? Definately.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2021-03-01 20:56  

#6  Re #4:Clem, see "Wag the Dog" from 1997
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2021-03-01 18:30  

#5  "A grim milestone today..."
Posted by: Frank G   2021-03-01 16:40  

#4  I wouldn't call it stumbling. Besides, a little war with thousands killed and maimed might take our minds off of other troubles.
Posted by: Clem   2021-03-01 15:48  

#3  Stumbling? It'll be more like a face plant.
Posted by: Raj   2021-03-01 14:39  

#2  As accidental stumbling as Chevy Chase making a joke at President Ford's expense.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2021-03-01 08:02  

#1  When the time is ripe Biden will divert attention. Democrat's live in a world of fear.
Posted by: Dale   2021-03-01 07:51  

00:00