You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Ghislaine Maxwell case details too ‘sensational and impure' for public, judge says
2021-03-21
[NYP] A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too "sensational and impure" to reveal to the public.

US District Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a ruling on redactions that Maxwell had asked for regarding transcripts the government filed under seal last month.

"Those portions of the transcript, which were redacted in the civil matter, concern privacy interests and their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ’craving for that which is sensational and impure,’" Nathan wrote in the order.

The judge also granted redactions that prosecutors made when filing the transcript. Prosecutors had argued the redactions were necessary to "protect the integrity" of the investigation into Maxwell and to protect the privacy of third parties.
Posted by:Besoeker

#12  'Impure' would mean the Clintons.
I'm surprised she didn't say 'sacrilegious'.
Posted by: Dron66046   2021-03-21 23:45  

#11  The Five Eyes and the Seth Rich mystery flicker for a moment and are gone from view.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2021-03-21 12:15  

#10  

Only guessing......
But maybe she does not want to HANG HERSELF.
Posted by: NN2N1   2021-03-21 11:28  

#9  re: #8 above. No, Roberts.
Posted by: Canuckistan sniper   2021-03-21 11:11  

#8  Who's the judge trying to protect? Clinton?
Posted by: Ho Chi Hupoluter6839   2021-03-21 10:59  

#7  So, you can hear "Wet A$$ P*$$y" on the radio or TV but can't hear about American politicians diddling kids on a private island? Seems sort of arbitrary to me...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2021-03-21 10:56  

#6  What phooking bull sh!t.

@ #1 - I think Besoeker nailed it.
Posted by: Clem   2021-03-21 10:38  

#5  Ayuh, if the guilty party was Joe Blow (no pun intended) I'm sure the judge would have ruled the same way.
Posted by: CrankyOldYankee   2021-03-21 10:14  

#4  It means that they implicate certain people.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2021-03-21 09:28  

#3  Too 'sensational and impure' means they fear a run on the market for tar and feathers, and rope if the details came out.
Posted by: ruprecht   2021-03-21 09:00  

#2  too ‘sensational and impure' for public

the judge hasn't been on the internet much has she.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-03-21 08:34  

#1  'Too Sensational and impure' for public

Translation: Bi-lateral intelligence activities likely involved.
Posted by: Besoeker   2021-03-21 08:09  

00:00