Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Klobuchar: Infrastructure bill could include voting measures |
2021-07-20 |
[KSTP] Congressional Democrats are exploring ways to include financial incentives for states to expand voting access as part of a massive infrastructure bill, a key senator said Sunday. Democrats have been struggling to get their marquee election reform bill passed in an evenly split Senate, where Republicans remain unified in their opposition and rules require 60 votes to advance most pieces of legislation. Sen. Amy Klobuchar ![]() getting the bestfrom them. Her name spelled backward in the Russian alphabet would be "Rachubolk," which sounds pretty daggone suspicious... , a Democrat from Minnesota who chairs the powerful Senate Rules Committee, said in an interview that the priority continues to be passing the legislation known as the For the People Act, which would usher in minimum voting standards in the U.S. such as automatic and same-day voter registration, early voting and no-excuse absentee voting. But Klobuchar noted that Democrats could also use the process known as reconciliation to advance financial incentives for states to adopt certain reforms. Election systems have been designated critical infrastructure on par with the nation’s power plants, banks and dams. "You can do election infrastructure in there because that is part of infrastructure," Klobuchar said. "It’s no substitute for the For the People Act, but it is something we can start working on immediately and are working on right now." Pushing election-related measures into the infrastructure bill would be a high-stakes gambit with no guarantee of success. Under the congressional budget process, certain measures regarding revenues, spending and the debt can be approved with a 51-vote threshold, which is why Democrats are pursuing it. The process allows them to bypass a near-certain filibuster from Republicans. But there’s a catch: The Senate’s nonpartisan parliamentarian can rule for the removal of any provision not directly related to the budget, or items whose budget impact is "merely incidental" to their intended policy changes. In the end, Democrats would not achieve their goal of federal standards through the infrastructure bill alone but could incentivize some states to move in that direction. "Money with incentives has passed before. So let’s see what we can get approved," Klobuchar said. "But again, that is only part of it. Look, it’s not the whole thing, right? But it’s a tool you don’t want to let go." Related: Amy Klobuchar: 2021-06-17 Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge Amy Klobuchar: 2021-02-24 Intelligence Did Not Support Troops For January Six Amy Klobuchar: 2021-02-15 Trump Now Most Acquitted President In History Related: For the People Act: 2021-07-18 Three Texas Democrats who fled to Washington, D.C. test positive for coronavirus For the People Act: 2021-07-11 Dems' outrageous attempt to tilt elections in their favor For the People Act: 2021-06-29 Desperate Barack Obama Pleads with Lawmakers to Push Through ‘For the People Act' to Make it Easier For Democrats to Steal Elections (VIDEO) |
Posted by:Fred |
#4 Isn't the authority to determine how elections are held defined in some old, mouldy, document somewhere. I think it was called the... let me think... Constitution. Unless they are going for an amendment ther actions are moot. And an amendment would probably not pass. OTOH the states were stupid enough to pass the 17th - giving up election of Senators... |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2021-07-20 20:42 |
#3 "Rules, we don't need no steenking rules!" --Klobuchar |
Posted by: magpie 2021-07-20 17:38 |
#2 I have a lot less concern about this creature than I do about the creatures who voted for it... |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2021-07-20 06:55 |
#1 Strange looking tongue. Is that a freeze plug hole ? |
Posted by: Besoeker 2021-07-20 02:06 |