You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senators Launch Effort to Expand Federal Bench by 77 Judges
2021-08-10
[BREITBART] Sens. Todd Young (R-IN) and Chris Coons
...Dem Junior Senator from Delaware since 2010. He won a special election to succeed Ted Kaufman, who had been appointed to the seat when Joe Biden resigned to become Vice President. Previously, Coons was the county executive of New Castle County. Raised in Hockessin, Delaware, Coons was a frat boy at the Amherst College liberal mill. He received graduate degrees from Yale Divinity School and Yale Law School....
(D-DE) introduced a bill last month that would expand the federal judiciary by 77 judges, starting in 2025, after the current presidential term.
Democrats have been expressing a wish to expand the number of Supreme Court
...the political football known as The Highest Court in the Land, home of penumbrae and emanations...
justices, so that President Joe The Big Guy Biden
...46th president of the U.S. I'm not working for you. Don't be such a horse's ass....
can appoint four new justices to override the current 6-3 majority of Republican appointees. Some have advocated a milder approach, expanding the lower courts first.

The new bill, called the Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved (JUDGES) Act, says that "The Judicial Conference of the United States requested the creation of 77 new district judges in its 2021 report," and that "As of March 31, 2021, there were 696,789 pending cases, averaging 803 filings per judgeship." The Coons-Young legislation provides for 39 new judgeships to be created after Jan. 21, 2025, and 38 new judgeships after Jan. 21, 2029.

Last year, during the presidential campaign, Biden dodged the question of whether he would endorse Democrats’ calls to pack the Supreme Court, finally announcing that he would appoint a commission of "scholars" to consider the issue. But Democrats jumped the gun, unveiling legislation in both the House and the Senate in April to expand the number of Supreme Court justices from nine to thirteen.

The federal judiciary expanded by 30 percent under President Jimmy Malaise Carter
...peanut farming former nuclear sub officer, who succeeded Gerald Ford as president. Carter perfected the approach later used by Joe Biden to get elected, presenting himself as a moderate whose Zero-based Budgeting was going to so away with the federal deficif. Once in the hands George McGovern's rejects, who were ever so much more virtuous than the rest of us, the nation immediately spun into a Malaise®. By the time Jimmeh, as he was contemptuously referred to, was running against Ronald Reagan, the liberal columnists were pronouncing the nation's problems as too severe to be solved by anyone; they were simply unsolvable, or maybe insoluble. That was why Reagan was such a flop. After Obama, Jimmeh's's only the second worst president ever, and by the time Biden's done maybe the third. Depending on how many Dems we elect in coming years, he may even end up looking competent...
, who filled the resultant vacancies with liberal-minded justices. A smaller expansion took place in 1990, under President George H.W. Bush.

Left-wing judicial activists are describing judicial expansion as an urgent priority.


Posted by:Fred

#4  77 more? Why not 335 million? Put a break on the combined scourges of "making everything illegal" and the "plea bargain legal system".
Posted by: magpie   2021-08-10 10:13  

#3  REVEALED: Biden has only filled 112 of 779 Senate-approved government positions - and is struggling to get key picks such his ATF head David Chipman and two border chiefs confirmed
Posted by: Skidmark   2021-08-10 08:15  

#2  Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved (JUDGES) Act

Any time they've thought up some "cute" bureaucratic acronym, vote NO. As in F*&k NO
Posted by: Frank G   2021-08-10 07:53  

#1  The other approach would be to trim the library of federal laws and regulations, thus requiring less of the branch's attention. That, and barring them from granting themselves new powers of review.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2021-08-10 06:00  

00:00